So, you really know nothing at all about history. Yet, you berate those who actually know history. When you read this description of the "Winter War" it sounds almost like a description of the war in Ukraine.
1) Invasion of Finland by Soviet Russia.
2) Despite superior military strength, especially in tanks and aircraft, the Soviet Russia suffered severe losses and initially made little headway.
3) The world's nations condemned the Soviet Russian aggression and imposed sanctions, including expulsion from the League of Nations.
4) The Soviet Russians made the same ridiculous excuse of "security reasons" for its invasion.
5) The Russians invaded Finland after Finland refused the idiotic Russian demands.
6) The same pattern repeats with all of Russia's neighbors, which is why NATO exists and why Finland and Sweden now wish NATO membership, because no one is safe from Russian aggression.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_War
It is ironic that Russia's aggression is always counter-productive because of its own incompetence. That has also happened this year. Finland and Sweden previously had no interest in NATO membership. Now they do. NATO previously had only trip-wire levels of troops near the Russian border, now it will have full-blown military bases and a far larger number of troops. Nice job, Russia. You really improved your security.