Thank you both,
i think they still dont report (at least for low turnovers) but i was surprised because in their previous
privacy statements they went from stating "no reporting" to "assets reporting" and now they separated the statements regarding assets (asking for a tax identification code) and a more general statement regarding
crs. I wonder why and this could be a signal they are going through some major changes.
So the thing is that reporting or not reporting is not a choice, either you are forced to report or you are not forced to. With assets they are forced, because the entity that they have that holds asset has a licence that forces them to report. I have friends which worked on a brokerage account which was not reporting even if forced to, and....the brokerage account failed and a lot of money disappeared. Avoid at all costs entities which are forced to report but will not, they don't end well, think of Loyal Bank.
Currently only banks of countries that have subscribed to CRS or
FATCA are forced to report, not EMIs, because EMIs are not bank. Since the USA has not subscribed to CRS, if you are from europe and have an account with a
USA bank, you are not reported. With Wise even if you have an account with a belgian IBAN, that is a virtual account, it's Wise which is holding your money in a single account, so that's why there is no reporting even if you have a EUR IBAN.
Of course Wise collaborates with
OECD, they are a public company, and that's why you can't use Wise Business for a lot of things. But collaborating means "trying to prevent money laundering", which means that if Wise detects suspicious activities they might proactively signal you to the relevant autorities ( they were fined in....Abu Dhabi for not being vigilant enough, if you can believe such a thing said by UAE ).
But Wise also has clear that not having automatic CRS is a plus for its customer, so it has to walk a thin line between all the conflicting interests. The difference with othe EMIs is that Wise is profitable on it's main business, which is currency conversion, so for now they have been able to live without a banking licence.
Revolut was losing vast amounts of money before getting that bank licence. And the fact that Wise is profitable is what make people trust wise with sums which are higher than what you would normally leave on an
EMI: if Wise fails spectacularly, you don't get any money back, while EU banks customer are protected up to 100k from the EU in case the bank fails.
Nobody can predict what will happen, and again, the fact that wise doesn't report automatically doesn't mean that the tax authority will never know, they simply have to ask wise if you have an account.