Took them 2 months and $6m to develop.
As someone said in the comments section - "This is a competition between the Chinese in the US and the Chinese in China." lol
https://www.deepseek.com/
I agree with you on principle, China does what China does.On top of that, it's using smugled Western hardware, quote DeepSeek has 50,000 NVidia H100’s that they can’t talk about
Everything coming from China is intended to force their political naratives and is either stolen Western or Russian IP or smugled and RE hardware.
Dumping prices for access arround new US president inauguration? C'mon, it's another Chinese ruse.
Wouldn't use that by any chance.
Plus you can run models that do not refuse anything you ask of them.
I asked a question about why the internet is slow in China. It started to reply but then stopped and said it was beyond its scope.An output from DeepSeek
https://medium.com/data-science-in-your-pocket/deepseek-is-highly-biased-dont-use-it-2cb0358647f9
Not only biased, which means that PRC government censorship is applied, but by using it, we would feed and develop not only competition's LLM, but a hostile competition one - they are already using our hardware and knowledge against our interests.
Sorry, but, Russia is a natural ally of the West. China simply isn't.
You know my position and stance about cloud solutions that we don't own and manage. LLM/AGI models that can be run locally exist and they should be used - not Chinese ones.
Well... so what?On top of that, it's using smugled Western hardware, quote DeepSeek has 50,000 NVidia H100’s that they can’t talk about
I agree at 110%.Everything coming from China is intended to force their political naratives
With all due respect, I cannot agree. (Unfortunately.)and is either stolen Western or Russian IP or smugled and RE hardware.
According to Nature (see here https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00229-6), the code is under MIT licence, the training data are unavailable. (Expectable; and fair enough, IMO.)But the model is open source
I agree.and this will result in accessibility in the long run. Which hopefully means we can run high-quality models locally on affordable hardware instead of relying on cloud solutions. Plus you can run models that do not refuse anything you ask of them.
Yes. Hence take the code, build and run independentlyAn output from DeepSeek
https://medium.com/data-science-in-your-pocket/deepseek-is-highly-biased-dont-use-it-2cb0358647f9
Not only biased, which means that PRC government censorship is applied, but by using it, we would feed and develop not only competition's LLM, but a hostile competition one
To be honest, I agree with the latter; but as for the former, I do not think that Russia is a natural ally of the contemporary West... and I understand it well. The cultural differences gap become too wide. (It should not have happened; and perhaps West is even more guilty. My 2 cents.)Sorry, but, Russia is a natural ally of the West. China simply isn't.
Well... so what?
I agree at 110%.
With all due respect, I cannot agree. (Unfortunately.)
Yes, many, if not all, Chinese technologies were built using foreign IP (many times without the consent of the IP owner); but currently, they are developing on their own. Have a look e.g. at the railways.
According to Nature (see here https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00229-6), the code is under MIT licence, the training data are unavailable. (Expectable; and fair enough, IMO.)
I agree.
Yes. Hence take the code, build and run independently
To be honest, I agree with the latter; but as for the former, I do not think that Russia is a natural ally of the contemporary West... and I understand it well. The cultural differences gap become too wide. (It should not have happened; and perhaps West is even more guilty. My 2 cents.)
This sounds pretty dooming. But shows that access to cheap labour and energy accelerates many things.I have been co-developing an open-source LLM model for the last 12 months, DeepSeek makes most of our work obsolete, well, actually all we need to do now is to do it the Chinese way, copy it and fine tune it for our needs.
And I am pretty sure that they are very well aware that they will lack it for a very long time to come. An education system based on memorising (remember what AI is capable of) is simply so what of 1925 and entirely useless. Any state of sound mind would mandate that any exam in school must allow a minimum of 10 pages of handwritten notes.Regarding smugled hardware; if the PRC is capable for anything else then theft and copycat, they would have original ideas and capacities - which they lack.
They probably stole pretty much everythingSo, I wouldn't be surprised that DeepSeek is using Western training data and not only hardware.
Ok, here we go, for you, @Frankie and @John Spectre:I absolutely love it when people get triggered by anything China . Still waiting for some usual suspects who have not turned up yet
completely fake news triggered by the keyword China for to fulfill your prophecy said:I just read that they have been scanning OCT and will soon revive long gone posters. Stay tuned.