(I presume I don't care about tax credits, why would I.)
@jackfrost thanks for sharing your thoughts. Interesting. As for me, I am already resident from before in a pretty-much-zero-tax jurisdiction, so I don't have the problem most have of "what about when my home country wants taxes/asks questions", which could motivate them to stay 183 days in one place only for that reason - I moved out years and years ago.
What you are asking me in a way is the
nomad's dilemma, "to want to be counted as being 183 days on Malta per year, or not to be counted as being".
I think mostly in Europe you can stay as a tourist with
no tax obligations for 179 or 89 days per year, so if you are going around like that, you don't get sucked into
tax residency in Europe - successful nomadism.
When I read Malta's materials, it appears to me like they kind of presume of me as ID card holder, that I am "ordinarily resident" as they call it. They don't even have a definition for ordinarily resident, so I simply "am if I say I am" plus I don't spend more than 6 months away from Malta (some rule says something to that effect doesn't it), so come for a weekend every 179 days.
Do you see any reason why I would *not* be ordinarily resident on Malta, while never spending more than 179 days away from Malta, though while not paying the "Global Resident" program's 15k€+9.6k€ rent?
I guess to keep the ID I would need to maintain that I am indeed ordinarily resident on Malta?
If I like to make a case that I'm *not* ordinarily resident on Malta, what would I fill out on the self-assessment tax form?
Last, if I am counted as ordinarily resident, how should companies I control (in zero and low tax jurisdictions) be structured, is the point to structure them just like the Malta 5%-without-refund-procedure is setup?
Your thoughts on these points are much appreciated.