Same here. A joke of a bank.I got the same notification and error from bankera, closed the account years ago. Guess its some kind ogf bug in theire system.
I agree.Same here. A joke of a bank.
As a last resource for someone looking to bank somewhere but got refused everywhere else it may still be a valid EMI - same like The Kingdom bank and similar services.
I managed to log into mine earlier today -> used a VPN.I opened a Bankera account yonks ago, I don't think it was ever used more than 200-1,000 Euro, if that... (can't remember as its years ago).
Hello,
There is an unread message waiting for you at Bankera. Log in to your account to read it.
Had an email from them yesterday about an notification in my account, proceed to login (or attempt) and it gave me some sort of error "Unexpected error. Please contact support".
So guess I am locked out from reading what ever the notification is lol.
So i'd say no.
There was the big laundering fiasco a few years ago in that neck of the woods... suspect they are overly covering their arse now....what's wrong with Bankera. They always want new documents and it's never enough. I rarely used Bankera and didn't even transfer a total of 200-300 EUR in small amounts between my accounts. Then I had to fill out a questionnaire, it wasn't accepted, now they want a BANK statement for 6 months and address verification..WOW
I have enough EMIs in my phone that work well, so my question is: Is there any point in clarifying everything with Bankera and using the bank account, or better Close it? What would you recommend?
I am not referring to the fact are they bad or good. I am showcasing it from position of people complaining about their work style.Technically Bankera delivered a bank....
But coin didn't moon
Just an FYI, in 2018/19 anything crypto related became toxic, mainly because of shitcoin speculators screaming all over twitter...
So a lot of projects that were looking into banking were simply rejected and/or the banking solutions they dreamt up became untenerable due to emerging restrictions in the market place.
For the shitcoin speculators they also signed contracts or agreed to terms and conditions, which basically meant they bought a token and the token may or may not be utilisable against x product if x product is delivered...
However when they were down in the secondary markets and projects bleeding capital (mainly marketing) and folded or changed directions they all of a sudden felt they were akin to shareholders.
Fortunately the UK, EU has since determined they were in-fact merely utility token holders not securities.
Thus 2019-2021 bull market was born, and soon (ongoing 2023-2024 bull market..
Could you please post some sources for these claims?If you trace it even little from web:
The operating costs of buying a white label banking service in 2017-2018 to offer a credit card (crypto card) was roughly 250,000 USD a year (actually have the quote somewhere and breakdown).I am not referring to the fact are they bad or good. I am showcasing it from position of people complaining about their work style.
MAYBE THEY EVEN DO NOT WANT TO WORK.
cause they already took money and they just need a “case” that they delivered.
Think of this.
The claims are legit FYI... remember their ICO... think i had some of their coins somewhere lolCould you please post some sources for these claims?
I'm aware of several of the accusations already (and I've expressed criticism of Bankera/Pervesk on several occasions). However, since @Kranders has a history of posting an unprompted favorable review of a competing business, it would be prudent to ensure that sources are provided by @Kranders for these claims.The claims are legit FYI... remember their ICO... think i had some of their coins somewhere lol
You can find plenty of public information supporting his claims, which form the best explanation for the odd behavior and business model of Bankera.I'm aware of several of the accusations already (and I've expressed criticism of Bankera/Pervesk on several occasions). However, since @Kranders has a history of posting an unprompted favorable review of a competing business, it would be prudent to ensure that sources are provided by @Kranders for these claims.