Skype no longer encrypts calls and governments have access now.
Our valued sponsor
Hope no one is using Ghost.
- Thread starter wellington
- Start date
does not conform with the 2nd and 3rd requirements:
Skype was also replaced by Teams, which I wouldn't even recommend for regular communication. It feels like Microsoft is playing a joke on us at this point.
Check this site out, offers a feature comparison of many encrypted messaging apps, ranging from civilian apps such as snapchat, facebook, and discord, all the way to Signal, SimpleX, Briar, etc.
Messenger-Matrix • Kuketz IT-Security Blog
Messenger: Comparison of security- and data protection-relevant features of messengers
www.messenger-matrix.de
have used it to speak with tax authorities, so I feel it is secure
Maybe you also used NetMeetinghave used it to speak with tax authorities, so I feel it is secure
Microsoft NetMeeting - Wikipedia
Microsoft never had any product that was technically good. It is like Aldi. They have cheap stuff that has wide acceptance. And most of the time it is quite poor implementation.
have used it to speak with tax authorities, so I feel it is secure
That's the Capo di Tutti Capi so here you are 100% protected!
When asking about which communication and collaboration platform to use, a use case and threat model are defining factors.
We should not advise any particular end user profile - especially the ones with criminal behavior - to use any communication platform that may facilitate their illicit business
Seriously, there are bad guys reading these forums and I really pay attention what and how I write anything - no need for aiding and abetting indictment.
Of the humor, ToX and Briar are beside being decentralized solutions - hence, there may be (are) performance penalties - simply another jar with honey. Also, TOR may be implied with those solutions, so I would keep any content above private from them.
XMPP is a stable protocol. As an overlay, can utilize encrypted content - OTR, OMEMO, openPGP & S/MIME and other closed cryptographic solutions. By architecture is centralized - which is decent - but can be federated - which is optimal and clustered - which is perfect.
Rocket.chat is a not mature and is an quasi-integrated derivative.
Never use something that is created just for the purpose of defeating the surveillance.
Matrix
is a British blue pill 
Do not use it
Sometimes, a properly implemented TLS - as a transit encryption - offers more confidentiality then any content encryption designed by youngsters can
We tested plethora of competitors' applications, including Simplex. They all failed, even SecuSmart and Silent Circle products and some from
I already wrote about Simplex in
and generally about secure communication in
I will always share publicly what I can - as I believe in certain transparency posture. But, I will not publicly comment specifics nor go against competition.
Without secure environment, no application and cryptographic system can protect the content.
We should not advise any particular end user profile - especially the ones with criminal behavior - to use any communication platform that may facilitate their illicit business
Seriously, there are bad guys reading these forums and I really pay attention what and how I write anything - no need for aiding and abetting indictment.Of the humor, ToX and Briar are beside being decentralized solutions - hence, there may be (are) performance penalties - simply another jar with honey. Also, TOR may be implied with those solutions, so I would keep any content above private from them.
XMPP is a stable protocol. As an overlay, can utilize encrypted content - OTR, OMEMO, openPGP & S/MIME and other closed cryptographic solutions. By architecture is centralized - which is decent - but can be federated - which is optimal and clustered - which is perfect.
Rocket.chat is a not mature and is an quasi-integrated derivative.
Never use something that is created just for the purpose of defeating the surveillance.
Matrix
is a British blue pill Do not use it Sometimes, a properly implemented TLS - as a transit encryption - offers more confidentiality then any content encryption designed by youngsters can
We tested plethora of competitors' applications, including Simplex. They all failed, even SecuSmart and Silent Circle products and some from
I already wrote about Simplex in
and generally about secure communication in
This may be off-topic.
I respect your opinion despite that you have a wrong one. Time will prove that to you. And, I wish you without detrimental consequences.
Auditing and standards' certification doesn't mean anything It's as accounting - can be quite creative
I respect your opinion despite that you have a wrong one. Time will prove that to you. And, I wish you without detrimental consequences.
Auditing and standards' certification doesn't mean anything
It's as accounting - can be quite creative I will always share publicly what I can - as I believe in certain transparency posture. But, I will not publicly comment specifics nor go against competition.
Without secure environment, no application and cryptographic system can protect the content.
Last edited:
100% this! Totally agree!
Also, 100% this! When the bad guys sing, some will even compose.
Similar threads
- Article
Latest Threads
-
-
-
-
-
Binance FZE (UAE) launching early December
- Started by myself
- Replies: 2
