yes the IRS had the OCIF commission lie to shut down the bank. The IRS also got the OCIF Commissioner to reject the sale of the bank to Qenta, which she had already supported. This was done solely so the J5 would have something to brag about. The only success they have is their failed investigation of Euro Pacific Bank. Since their massive two year investigation found absolutely nothing, they got the OCFI Commissioner to shut down my bank so they could save face. It's too bad the main stream media refuses to tell this story. Incredible example of government corruption, that goes all the way to the top of the IRS.
Our valued sponsor
Euro Pacific bank is a scam
- Thread starter sonato
- Start date
-
- Tags
- euro pacific bank
Obviously not according to OCIF since opt in clients are going to Quenta anyway. So according to OCIF Quenta is both unfit and fit to manage the money of the customers of EPB. Also according to them EPB was both insolvent and not insolvent at the same time. But why blame them when we can blame someone who lacked the power to do anything? Makes sense I guess. Maybe, perhaps.
The bank lost tis Fed account as we did not get our financial done in time. That's because the auditor quit after the J5 investigation was exposed by the media. Qenta would have gotten it back. But there were other qualified buyer. The OCIF Commissioner refused to allow the bank to be bought. That is not what the IRS wanted. The J5 needed the bank shut down so it would have a "success" to show for all the taxpayer money they wasted.
Thank you for the reply.
As i read the latest reports from the reciever he has taken there was about 113 million USD that the reciever needed to get back from different sources. As of the latest report he has retrieved about 112 million USD.
I am just wondering if these numbers sound about the amount owed to the depositors?
With all respect no I totally disagree. Its not the job of a depositor to sue anybody. The bank has to have a proper management and should function properly - this was not the case here
The bank did function properly. But then the Puerto Rico government put it out of business. Not because the bank actually did anyhting wrong, but because the IRS wanted the bank shut down as a publicity stunt for the J5.
Because I own the bank. I know what happened. I also know all the lies the Commissioner told to create a pretense to reject the sale to Qenta and put the bank into receivership. Plus, I got the reply to my FOIA request that showed OCIF and the IRS planned the conference to announce the closure of the bank over three months in advance. But during those three months OCIF continued to represent to the bank and Qenta that the sale was still on track for approval. Also not once did it inform the bank that its capital was too low to operate, and that additional capital was needed. I now have a lawsuit against the IRS to compel them to provide the rest of the documents that further reveal the conspiracy, as the IRS had refused to produce them.
No, the lawsuit is against the IRS to force them to turn over documents that I am entitled to under the FOIA. The IRS is not involved in the liquidation of the bank. The IRS only "convinced" the OCIF Commissioner to liquidate the bank, rather than to allow the planned sale to Qenta. But once the bank was actually put into receivership, I assume the IRS moved on. But I won't know for sure until I get all the documents. What I do know for sure is but for the interference of the IRS on behalf of the J5, the planned sale to Qenta would have gone through. So no customers funds would have been tied up for even one second. The IRS/J5 investigation found no evidence of money laundering or tax evasion. So they got the OCIF Commissioner to shut down the bank so they could pretend the bank was guilty and take credit for helping to close it down. The OCIF Commissioner used low capital as an excuse. But seven months before she shut down the bank, I offered to inject $7 million in capital, which was millions more than the shortfall, bur the Commissioner told me not to. She said the bank's capital was fine to operate until the Qetna sale went through, at which time Qenta would add the additional capital needed. After she said that no one from OCIF ever mentioned the bank's capital until the surprise shut-down for low capital. Even after the shutdown for low capital I offered to add the additional capital to keep the bank operating for the benefit of customers, but the Commissioner refused.
please stop this nonsense even in the official IRS paper it cleary states that several european countries lead investigations for tax evasions against EPB clients! And please stop telling the same story again and again.
Those stories are BS. That's part of the hoax to pretend Euro Pacific Bank was quilty of money laundering and tax evasion. During the defamation case that I won against 6o Minutes Australia and the Age, they were asked to name one person who Euro Pacific Bank helped launder money or evade taxes. They could not name one, despite having accused the bank of helping hundreds. Why can't you believe that government tax officials lie and commit fraud. The most corrupt people work for governments. Now Im sure of the more than 10,000 people who had accounts at EPB over the years, a few cheated on their taxes. But that's true of every bank in the world. My guess is the incidence of tax evasion among Euro Pacific Bank customers was lower than for offshore banks in general, and probably most onshore banks as well. Our KYC and AML was far stricter than industry norms.
Nobody is forcing you to read. People have been silenced. There’s no need to have that here. Everyone shares their opinion and everyone will be richer by reading.
By the way saying that someone is guilty because they were investigated is nonsense. One of my relatives was investigated and imprisoned in the Uk for terrorism because he wanted to buy a house in the US. That was his crime, and being brown. I only know this because I was involved in proving he was not a terrorist. So some people aren’t as confident in the nobility and lawful nature of these government agencies as you are. You know I wonder why they need to know everything about everyone but we can know nothing when they investigate us. Makes you think…
By the way saying that someone is guilty because they were investigated is nonsense. One of my relatives was investigated and imprisoned in the Uk for terrorism because he wanted to buy a house in the US. That was his crime, and being brown. I only know this because I was involved in proving he was not a terrorist. So some people aren’t as confident in the nobility and lawful nature of these government agencies as you are. You know I wonder why they need to know everything about everyone but we can know nothing when they investigate us. Makes you think…
Mr Schiff repeats and repeats the same story, he wants to portry himself a victim but his reckless behaviour came
at the expense of the depositors...
at the expense of the depositors...
I am a victim. I am the single largest victim. I lost tens of millions of dollars. Maybe hundreds. Customers will eventually get most of their money back. They are victims too. Neither I nor anyone at the bank behaved recklessly. The IRS, OCIF Commissioners, and "journalist" were reckless. The only thing I did was publicly criticize excessive government taxation and regulation. I guess you can call that reckless if you want. But we were not reckless with customer's deposits. We didn't even loan any of them out. When it came to safeguarding customer's deposits I owned the least reckless bank in the world. We just could not safeguard them from corrupt government officials.
Yes, and the the IRS agents involved too.
I guess many of us are tired to read about conspiracies about who is to blame. What we should focus on instead is: where is the money? what is still missing to finalize the issues? how long is all that still going to take realistically? By the way: nice to have Peter back to the conversation. One question to you Peter: the funds of the customers seem to have been shifted to different places. what about the Gold and Silver Holdings? Did those left Singapore in meanwhile as well, or having been sold without the consent of the customers?
Latest Threads
-
-
-
Georgia - possibility of putting crypto gains and foreign capital gains on tax return
- Started by JohnDebo
- Replies: 8
-
Crypto Card (Vendor Payments 10,000Euro a month) - Provider- Started by wellington
- Replies: 5
-
Friend money transfer via company
- Started by kristiencrimson
- Replies: 9
