Our valued sponsor

ByBit hacked 1,4billions $ stolen ( in ETH).

The whole idea of a custodial wallet is subversive to the point of a scam. Sheeple too weak to take personal responsibility for their money, give it to regulated companies, thinking that means their money is safe. I wonder how many who lost their money will keep their own wallets from now on? Probably very few, because the sheep want their lives run for them.
 
One short question, I recently found approx. 1.4 billion USD in ETH and stETH. Unfortunately I have no SOF.
Any ideas how to cash it out with no questions asked?
It's urgent!nai¤%
rof/%

Joking aside.
This large amount can never be used by the thieves. There will always be queries about SOF.
And sooner or later they will make a mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uplana
One short question, I recently found approx. 1.4 billion USD in ETH and stETH. Unfortunately I have no SOF.
Any ideas how to cash it out with no questions asked?
It's urgent!nai¤%
rof/%

Joking aside.
This large amount can never be used by the thieves. There will always be queries about SOF.
And sooner or later they will make a mistake.
there are countries where no SoF questions asked when crypto is involved, for example Russia or China.
 
this is even better than FTX

1740327752354.webp
 
Congrats to Ben Zhou on his newfound billionaire status.

This.
His explanation makes no sense.
Could you please explain how and why?
If this is his own exchange anyway, why would he steal it and probably damage big equity value of his exchange?
Moreover, today onchain tracing and analytics are so comprehensive and assisted by AI that he has almost no chance to launder his proceeds (or he will lose probably 60-80% of the net asset value to do so by dealing with those willing to handle it). So they are likely stuck with a 10-fig asset they can't properly spend in most jurisdictions
What would be the benefit?
Even if this negates their total income for this year, as they claim, assuming they are Dubai based, they would only be due 9% of that.

I am ready to believe things are not what they say they are, but i see no cohesive explanation, backed by any facts so far

Either way, shitty days for crypto ....
 
Some updates over the weekend:

https://blog.trailofbits.com/2025/0...of-operational-security-failures-has-arrived/


Could you please explain how and why?
Compromising the signing infrastructure is one of the worst things that can happen to a company. The fact that all signs point to basic security failures says a lot about the management. If they can’t get the fundamentals right, they’re a risk to the organization. I’ve flagged this kind of thing to risk committees before as a classic insider threat. Fraud like this usually comes down to a mix of opportunity and the belief that they can actually pull it off.

Saying the funds can’t be laundered is wishful thinking. Sure, AI-powered tracking makes it harder, but there are still plenty of ways to cash out. Slow, structured withdrawals, OTC deals, or working with state-sponsored actors (hint, hint) and darknet liquidity pools. A well-connected person can move large amounts over time, even if they take a haircut on the value.

And if management ignored basic security controls, it’s not a stretch to think they also lacked internal oversight. That kind of setup is exactly how insider fraud happens, making an inside job more than just possible, it’s actually pretty likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: void and apres777
Some updates over the weekend:

https://blog.trailofbits.com/2025/0...of-operational-security-failures-has-arrived/



Compromising the signing infrastructure is one of the worst things that can happen to a company. The fact that all signs point to basic security failures says a lot about the management. If they can’t get the fundamentals right, they’re a risk to the organization. I’ve flagged this kind of thing to risk committees before as a classic insider threat. Fraud like this usually comes down to a mix of opportunity and the belief that they can actually pull it off.

Saying the funds can’t be laundered is wishful thinking. Sure, AI-powered tracking makes it harder, but there are still plenty of ways to cash out. Slow, structured withdrawals, OTC deals, or working with state-sponsored actors (hint, hint) and darknet liquidity pools. A well-connected person can move large amounts over time, even if they take a haircut on the value.

And if management ignored basic security controls, it’s not a stretch to think they also lacked internal oversight. That kind of setup is exactly how insider fraud happens, making an inside job more than just possible, it’s actually pretty likely.
well said, the company has obviously critical design flaws in their infrastructure and processes and will likely disappear from the market (which is a good thing)
I'd be surprised if the attackers would have to give up more than 20% of the nominal market value of the loot to cash out
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0xDEADBEEF
this particular event (just like FTX, Celsius and similar stories) is maybe bad for crypto but positive for bitcoin, the holders and self-custody, just another lesson what not to do and what everyone should have known for years
I would say it is shitty days for bitcoiners too. Even if they can gloat at every other coin bleeding to death, lazarus hopped onto BTC as well, so i assume all the old bs adages of compliance people about bitcoin being used for scams and money laundering will be back in full swing again and all attempts to make the industry look less scammy have been erased.
It was already hard cashing out crypto. I imagine it will get even worse now.
 
Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.