Exactly, that's why I ask what else it can bring me.
On the other hand if one can manage not to be a tax resident elsewhere it could be useful.
I skimmed much of the thread but I have been recently reading more deeply on the topic of foreign controlled corporations aka controlled foreign company aka
cfc.
I'm not sure your country of origin is, but without knowing the specific answer no one here can answer that question. Almost every country in the developed world has some version of cfc rules.
They basically are an anti-
tax avoidance measure. The USA is the most draconian, they tax earnings you have anywhere in the world, even in a private corporation simply because you are American and treat capital gains as
dividends in that sense. Other nations like Australia and Brazil and I believe UK might do this as well. They basically do not recognize your foreign corporation as a separate entity from the owner (Citizen)
UNDER ANY CONDITIONS if they own more than 50% of the "votes or value" and that number is increasingly being lowered to 10% (thank you Donald Trump... so much for Republicans cutting taxes eh).
Some people might think O well, I just not tell the government on my tax forms that I have this account in
Panama so they won't know I'm earning this money. This is why they have pushed
fatca and
crs so hard into every corner of the planet and automatic sharing agreements. They will not only know that you have those accounts, they will also know that you are lying too. And you will get hit with massive back taxes and fees. The only real solutions is to up and leave these countries. They have become so hostile and anti-business that you'd be better off giving up your
citizenship there, visiting and ironically using them as tax havens (Specifically the USA who doesn't share with outside countries and allows anonymous corps and doesn't even levy taxes on non-residents who earn nothing there).
The second set of CFC countries include Canada and countries like them. They technically have no formal rule calling it cfc, but what they do is they tax overseas income from citizen owned/controlled corporations not under any conditions but where it appears to be passive income. They basically have an active business/earnings test and a taxation test. Essentially, if you have what looks like a passive income that is being used to earn money through a subsidiary, they tax you at high rates. However, if you set up what looks like a legit business, you can bring home that earnings nearly tax free so long as taxes are paid in a foreign jurisidiction who has a tax sharing agreeement with canada. That is typically barbados who puts a 1-2.5% tax on these types of firms. So one could earn like $4 million USD from a web business, setup in Barbados with a manager and at least 5 employees to make it look legit (typically they like 5 employees from my reading as a minimum) -don't worry min wage in barbados is low- run your business from barbados as subsidiary, stay in Canada, and only pay like 2.5% tax, without having to relocate on your $4 million. Not too bad, probably walk away with $3.8 million vs paying Canadian tax man, 30-40%.
The third set of countries have no cfc rules, but it includes almost no developed nations, you might find one or two on there, but if it exist it would probably already be a place with low taxes like HK or already a
tax haven.
The benefit to relocating to Panama would be if you are in set 1 nations you reduce your taxes by exiting. If you are in set 2 nations you can effectively eliminate your tax rate if you have enough money.