Crypto-assets are intangible assets, therefore authorities have difficulty determining their location for tax purposes.
It seems like it is mostly just the UK and Ireland that have provided specific rulings (I excluded the US from my search bc it isn't an option for me but if Ameribros want to chime in, please do)
The HMRC (UK) has ruled that the situs of the asset is the residency of the beneficial owner.
Ireland says the onus is on the owner to prove the location of the gain. In order to be exempt from tax under the non-dom regime, the location of the gain must be clearly outside of Ireland, so if it is located 'nowhere' as they claim many crypto-assets are, then it is not tax-exempt bc it doesn't fulfill the 'outside of Ireland' criteria.
This is a HUUUGE issue.
There might be many unsuspecting crypto investors located in territorial tax countries, or lump-sum/non-dom regimes, who will get a surprise tax bill bc the tax authority will rule in the same way as the UK/Ireland.
Some people have said that if you keep your assets on an exchange, then the domicile of the exchange is where the assets are located. There is a debate over whether the criteria for situs should be the location of the person/entity who holds the keys (the exchange) vs the location of the person to whom benefit will flow from disposal of the assets (the account holder)
I would like to hear from people who have some expertise on the subject.
The other pitfall is the issue of being an investor vs a trader.
You can be hodling your BTC for more than a year in your capital-gains-tax-exempt paradise and then bc you didn't fulfil the criteria, you end up with a 35+% tax bill bc it is classified as business income/trader income
e.g. Switzerland - one of the criteria is that your gains need to be less than 50% of your income.
It seems the safe thing to do is to locate yourself in a
*tax haven (for either PIT and CIT) - harder/more expensive to get residency in usually
*a place with low CGT/PIT/CIT - just find a place where you pay 10% regardless of whether it is CGT or PIT/CIT
Any thoughts?
It seems like it is mostly just the UK and Ireland that have provided specific rulings (I excluded the US from my search bc it isn't an option for me but if Ameribros want to chime in, please do)
The HMRC (UK) has ruled that the situs of the asset is the residency of the beneficial owner.
Ireland says the onus is on the owner to prove the location of the gain. In order to be exempt from tax under the non-dom regime, the location of the gain must be clearly outside of Ireland, so if it is located 'nowhere' as they claim many crypto-assets are, then it is not tax-exempt bc it doesn't fulfill the 'outside of Ireland' criteria.
This is a HUUUGE issue.
There might be many unsuspecting crypto investors located in territorial tax countries, or lump-sum/non-dom regimes, who will get a surprise tax bill bc the tax authority will rule in the same way as the UK/Ireland.
Some people have said that if you keep your assets on an exchange, then the domicile of the exchange is where the assets are located. There is a debate over whether the criteria for situs should be the location of the person/entity who holds the keys (the exchange) vs the location of the person to whom benefit will flow from disposal of the assets (the account holder)
I would like to hear from people who have some expertise on the subject.
The other pitfall is the issue of being an investor vs a trader.
You can be hodling your BTC for more than a year in your capital-gains-tax-exempt paradise and then bc you didn't fulfil the criteria, you end up with a 35+% tax bill bc it is classified as business income/trader income
e.g. Switzerland - one of the criteria is that your gains need to be less than 50% of your income.
It seems the safe thing to do is to locate yourself in a
*tax haven (for either PIT and CIT) - harder/more expensive to get residency in usually
*a place with low CGT/PIT/CIT - just find a place where you pay 10% regardless of whether it is CGT or PIT/CIT
Any thoughts?
Last edited: