Our valued sponsor

Own Nothing, but Control Everything – A Concept That Can Change Your Life

Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.
Own Nothing, but Control Everything

John D. Rockefeller made an important statement once – Own nothing, but control everything. Coming from someone with incredible wealth, this aspect has been thoroughly analyzed overtime and has become a top rule for handling money.

What he meant is fairly simple to understand. If you do not own anything, it means it cannot be taken away from you. This is what asset protection truly means, and believe it or not, it can be done legally. Most people simply forget about this aspect, though.
1649055119002.png

John D. Rockefeller was born July 8, 1839, in Richford, New York, about midway between Binghamton and Ithaca.​
Back in the early 1990s, only a few people knew how asset protection truly works. With time, the popularity of this concept grew, so by the late 1990s, most millionaires had some clues about asset protection – it started spreading overnight.

The idea? What you do not own cannot be taken away from you – simple as that.

Own Nothing but Control Everything – A Few Examples


Here is how the industry works.


You and your partner have a new baby – Mary. You give Mary $25,000 for her college fund – just to help her get a good start in life. Later on, you end up in debt, and creditors come knocking on your door. Can a creditor get the money you gave to Mary?

No, they cannot. The money is a gift for Mary and is not a fraudulent convenient. At this point, Mary is the new owner, and since she is not a guarantor, she cannot be involved in the process. She will never be held accountable for your financial mistakes.

If the money is under Mary’s name, there is nothing to be worried about. Meanwhile, you can make various payments, trade with it, buy holidays, make a mortgage payment or perhaps start a business. You can do anything, despite the money not being owned by you.

Furthermore, you can make more transfers to entities in your asset protection trust without losing control.

Here is another example. You get a brand new Audi, and you take some friends out. You park it in front of their house and talk about it for a few minutes. They both work in the police, so they have some credibility in terms of law enforcement.

Now, imagine a homeless man walking by with a bag. Something sharp in that bag scratches your brand new car. You have some good witnesses, and you even have the homeless man not trying to run away. But then, what can you do?

He only has the clothes he is wearing, as well as whatever rubbish he has managed to find in that bag. Even if you take him to court, you will get nothing. This man owns nothing. He will not be arrested for it, and he has no physical address – you are only wasting your time and money.

This is pretty much the concept of own nothing, but control everything. Of course, you do not want to end up homeless. But then, there are legal procedures to ensure you can accumulate wealth without risking to lose it.

How the wealthy rely on trusts to preserve wealth

Some of the richest families or dynasties in the world own nothing, but they somehow seem to control lots of wealth. If you think about it for a second, why would you do that? That is actually the secret to long term wealth – the type of wealth achieved over generations.

Owning too much may not be an issue, but a small mistake can seriously damage your wealth. On the same note, even if you manage to control money affairs, one of your successors may not have the same business spirit and throw everything down the drain.

Whether you think about the Rockefeller family or perhaps the Rothschild family, such families control billions. Their wealth is simply impressive. Do they own anything? No. John D. Rockefeller was not joking when he said you should own nothing, but control everything.


The name Rothschild is synonymous with extravagant, old world wealth.​

This is how rich people ensure their wealth is not lost, but maintained and grown over multiple generations. Everything is owed to the people who created these dynasties and came up with the first steps in terms of wealth.

They were clever. They knew kids born in wealth might make terrible decisions. There are numerous temptations associated with money, and many of them are nothing but scandalous mistakes. This is why their wealth was placed in foundations and trust.

The best part about this concept is that no one actually owns the wealth. The ownership is confusing and vague – less likely to be affected by legal issues. Different trusts also have different rules regarding who can touch the wealth or how distributions are made.

A brief history of trusts

Trusts originally came to life in England. The Chancery Court gathered together a bunch of clever judges who decided that while some people may own property, someone else could benefit from it. It was unusual and confusing, but it was the base of what we see today.

The actual owner was referred to as a trustee. As for the beneficial user, they were known as the beneficiary. This law originated in the 12th century, and it persisted overtime – in fact, it was enhanced until it became what it is today.

Its popularity grew throughout the crusades. If a landowner had to leave the country to fight in such crusades, someone else was entrusted to manage the affairs while they were away. In return, the property would get back to the original owner.

Now, some trustees decided to go against the law, and after managing land for years, they decided they wanted to keep it. After all, it was their own work, and they actually deserved a part of what was built there.

The Lord Chancellor would then be petitioned for the so-called land return. Returning crusaders were always given the right of way. In other words, the trustee was supposed to return the land to the beneficiary when requested. This is how modern trust was created.

Modern uses for today’s trusts

These days, trusts are used with a similar, yet different purpose. Basically, their modern role is to preserve wealth. They are associated with families, rather than individuals. Simply put, assets achieved in one way or another are donated to the trust.

At that point, the donor no longer owns those assets legally, so they cannot be held responsible for them should any situations arise. Even as a beneficiary, there are certain rules associated with each trust out there.

For instance, you could come up with a trust for further generations. You can also set up a trust for charitable distributions on a regular basis. At that point, you can also control the trustees, so you decide for yourself when distributions are made.

You have full control of these assets, but from a legal point of view, you do not own them.

This is exactly what John D. Rockefeller meant when he said own nothing, but control everything.

When everything you have managed to gather overtime is held in a trust, the trust can lend you money and ensure you support your current lifestyle. You cannot be taxed on the respective money if you choose to pay a commercial interest rate.

No one can seize these assets if you end up in trouble with creditors.​

The same rule applies if you end up in an ugly divorce – your partner cannot seize anything.

Bank balances can get out of trouble, too, as they should not be reported based on FACTA or CRS rules. After all, they are not your assets. This is another secret wherefore rich people stay rich for multiple generations and pay little to nothing in tax.

Now, unlike most expectations, it is important to know that foundations and trusts are more than just some clever and legal ways to disguise who owns your assets. Sure, no one will know, but further strategies take things even further.

These things change the actual ownership in terms of legal matters. For example, you could have control over $1M in assets, without owning anything at all. You can live in a fancy mansion owned by a business that is owned and run by the trust – no one will be bothered.

The trust will also lend you money on a regular basis, so you can take care of all your expenses. You can travel by private jets instead of commercial airlines. You can live in the biggest house in your town and hang around like a millionaire – all these without owning anything.

At the same time, imagine your partner filing for divorce. Sadly for them, if your wealth is held in trust, they would not be able to get anything. They can hire the most experienced lawyers in the world – they cannot enter a trust.

Bottom line, trust will offer more than just privacy. It does not come with any accounting rules – no disclosure laws either. Nobody will really know what the trust owns. Disguising assets has never been easier, and the good news is everyone has access to such things.

Becoming judgment proof with a trust

Get your assets in offshore trust, and you will become immune to any court judgment. No lawyer, judge, or court will ever be able to steal anything from you – something that is quite common in today's society anyway.

More and more people hope for fat paychecks when they divorce. Then, if a company is large enough or an individual is rich, chances are someone out there will try to steal their money with some random lawsuits. These things happen on a daily basis.

It does pay off choosing the optimal jurisdiction if you decide on establishing a trust abroad. Sure, most people will not be aware of all these things, so they can still try. But as they hire lawyers, a professional will be able to check your assets – owning nothing means you can chase them away.

If you think about it, no one will pour a fortune into a law firm if the outcome is not certain.

Things can get even better if your trust is in a jurisdiction that is known to be hostile to creditors. Some creditors may go beyond the borders to try their luck, but certain countries out there have extremely strict rules against such things. Seeing such a country will put most people off.

Obviously, for such things to work, you need to ensure that visible assets are mortgaged with loans from a company that runs under the trust. This way, lawyers or creditors cannot seize assets in your original country either.

Good Jurisdictions to Establish Offshore Trusts

Here are some of the best jurisdictions chosen by those who want to hide wealth in trusts.

  • Cook Islands – known for having some of the strictest trust rules in the world, these semi independent islands can repel aggressive creditors with no issues at all. For maximum protection, assets should be in the trust for more than two years.
  • Panama – asset protection is fairly simple if you choose a foundation in Panama. The high level of confidentiality is not to be overlooked either. Fines for leaks are quite high and may even lead to prison, so no one really bothers with such things.

Now that you understand the concept of owning nothing but controlling everything, is it really worth it? The above-mentioned benefits make this structure ideal to ensure wealth is preserved, but there are also some potential problems you should be aware of.

Taxes associated with transparency

These days are different from the days when Rockefellers used to grab wealth like there was no tomorrow. These days, there are automatic exchanges that share information, so governments can get more details about your actual assets – even if they are stored in other countries.

If you are trying to avoid tax like wealthy families decades ago, it is less likely to happen today. Indeed, you will gain some protection, but you cannot avoid tax completely. Other countries have professional tax authorities too. Putting money in someone else’s name without reporting it could be an issue.

In the USA, you need to report accounts even if you only get a beneficial interest. If your signature has control over that money, it must be reported. Most other countries are not as strict, though, but the USA could be a real problem.

The idea that you could hide some money in an offshore account is not always viable. Many jurisdictions collaborate to prevent tax evasion. Indeed, if you pay your taxes and follow the rules, your protection is still in place.

Indeed, you will pay more today than what you had to pay decades ago.

But then, you can still benefit from asset protection in front of problematic lawsuits.

Defining asset protection

In theory, authorities cannot go after you if you do not own anything. If your name is not listed on an account, it is not yours. However, over the past few decades, there have been a few exceptions here and there.

Normally, no one can chase you for something that is not yours. But then, some judges have looked at the substance and circumstances, rather than the actual paperwork. A good lawyer can prevent all these things, though.

When putting people in charge of what you actually own, some judges may still link things to you. But these things are irrelevant if there is no major crime. Sure, if money comes from selling cocaine and can be linked to you, chances are you will get in trouble.

The general idea is fairly simple to understand. While you do gain some asset protection, not having anything in your name will still make your assets taxable. Avoiding tax is difficult, but as long as you pay what you owe, there should be no problems at all.

A few words about privacy

Privacy was one thing 30 years ago and a completely different thing today. While there are still plenty of tax havens to help optimize tax, the truth is you can no longer hide money – as in promoting tax evasion. This is a thing of the past.

More and more tax havens have now started complying with international laws. They are more transparent than ever. Indeed, they will share your details if needed, but you can still move your business operations to another country to pay 3% instead of 19%, for example.

This is perfectly legal.


On the other hand, hiding completely is almost impossible these days. Owning a company without anyone to know is hard, yet trust can make the information ambiguous. Some corporate registrars are open to the whole world – such as the one in the UK.

Technology does not help too much either. The whole world is interconnected now, so countries are open when it comes to business registrations. There are new rules to respect in tax havens too, yet you can still save a fortune.

Privacy is critical if you want to own nothing, but control everything. Privacy is still there in terms of the available information, but being completely anonymous is a thing of the past. If your goal is to avoid taxation, that is illegal.

Now, a trust can still hide who owns companies or the people behind the trust. But certain tax is still paid.

Potential operational issues

Operational issues can be avoided if you know how to handle your money or who to work with. For instance, dealing with high-quality institutions asks for a large budget, but it will also make your life easier in the long run.

This is one of those cases where having $100M is much easier than having $5M only.

Implementing the concept to own nothing, but control everything implies having structures. There is nothing wrong with that. But then, the more structures you run, the more complicated your venture will be – plus, expenses may add up.

Other than that, you will find banks that have specialized in trusts and similar structures. Affluent people will most likely go into the commercial category if they operate through a trust. There will be more paperwork and bureaucracy then.

Now, the point is to avoid getting involved with things you do not understand. Do your homework, research, read and become familiar with systems. If you think you can be one of those people you see in movies with 50 offshore companies with different names in the middle of nowhere, you are wrong.

This rule does not apply to trusts only, but to anything related to the offshore industry.

Once you dig deeper and get involved, you realize that there will be new ongoing expenses and further fees. As a general rule of thumb, the simpler your structure is, the better you will be. You need to keep things simple, so you can understand everything without any headaches.

Finally, if your concept of own nothing, but control everything is about creating luxurious lifestyles with fancy mansions and fast cars, you might fail – unless you already have millions. If you are new to this game, you might be disappointed by the outcome.

Instead, you need to do things bit by bit. Get in from scratch and grow from there while you still educate yourself. As you get more money, you will have more complications and so on. Doing things slowly can keep you on track without risking your hard earned money.

As a short final conclusion, the idea to own nothing, but control everything is definitely an appealing one. It used to work wonders decades ago, but things have changed a lot lately. It is not as easy as it used to be, yet running your assets through a trust can still bring in a plethora of advantages.

From protecting your assets and hiding identities to reducing tax, such things can still be done. But then, everything must be done within the law. If you hope to avoid tax completely by running a company in an exotic location, you are breaking the law, so it is out of the discussion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.
What nobody talks about is at what NW do you even consider this? That's how a guy earning 100k per year thinks it's a good move for him.
If you want it, go for it. A lot of people do stuff that they realistically may not need, but for some it's worth it. It may give you a sense of peace and safety.
 
  • Like
Reactions: burden
Specifically protection is in play when you have corporate entities owning all of your assets. If it ends in a trust it also helps you plan your estate ie who gets what after you pass away. You have a lot more control with a trust compared to your national inheritance laws.

A trust will not completely bypass any and all inheritance law but will definitely give you lots and lots more control.
sounds like you know about it, where would you setup such Trust, I mean, I read it all over the forum, but where would it be most secure to set this up?

Also I have not millions but a few hundred thousand euro I have.
 
The general concept is that a Trust owns a company (IBC/LLC) and that company owns all the assets to be protected. You are appointed as manager of the company but the trust owns it. You don't own anything, but you control the company and therefore the underlying assets. You as manager can take money out of the company as a wage/loan etc however documented in your operating agreement or resolutions made.

Now choosing a Trustee is obviously important because they become the legal owner of the company and will therefore have the right to remove you as manager etc. You can reserve certain powers as the settlor or put in provisions for beneficiaries however you need to be careful about doing so, and if done, how much power you give these people. If you give yourself as much power as the Trustee, a court will definitely rule the trust a sham and place your assets back up for grabs as personal assets. - I found a case where this happened in Cook Islands.

A good way to combat this is is to appoint a protector. The protector basically oversees the trustee and has the power to over ride their decisions, remove and appoint new trustees etc. You should have one - there's only a few good cases to not have a protector. Again though, don't give them too much power or they could simply remove the trustee and appoint themself for example.

A quick word on dishonest trustees - it's very rare that they simp[y steal your stuff. Instead what they more often do (if dishonest) is manufacture arguments between beneficiaries, legal battles etc so that they can charge huge fees and slowly, yet legally drain your assets.

Anyway, so essentially when a creditor comes chasing you, you dont own the trust assets (the company or company's assets) so they are protected. The only way to get the trust assets included for consideration by a court is to prove that the trust structure was a sham, illegal or not valid for any reason. This is why you don't give yourself too much power. Keep in mind, simply having a revocable trust means you are able to make changes and therefore is poor asset protection. Revocable trusts are great for estate planning however. Irrevocable trusts however are very permanent in nature so be sure before doing so. There are ways to make changes or dissolve them but it's tougher and thats generally a power that only the protector should have.

Now all of these structures for further protection should be setup offshore in a jurisdiction with a good history/reputation/trust & company law. For extra protection, the trust and company can be two separate jurisdictions, provisions can be added like a flight clause, trustees refusal to act if under duress, removal of managers if action occurs etc. Further, diversification is alway good principle. If you have a high-risk business, you could hold it under the same Trust but as a separate company from the one that just holds your money, houses etc. That way if the company is sued directly, the other company is untouchable and you "may" even be able to move some of the high risk company's assets directly to the trust for protection.

As mentioned above, Nevis and Cook Islands are two often touted as the best. Nevis IMO wins out slightly. Their law specifically states that they do not recognize foreign judgements, that a local Nevis lawyer must hear the case in Nevis (which is tough because a good lawyer always works for the trust companies), the creditor must post up a bond before even taking action (I've often heard 100k but reading their actual law it states 25k), there is a very short statue of limitation for courts to even hear a case (often 1 year, sometimes 2) and the burden of proof is on the creditor and is at the highest possible standard of "beyond all reasonable doubt". Nevis highly regards privacy with nothing being public, the statute of Elizabeth is specifically written out of their law, spendthrift provisions are enforced and Lawyers have to work on retainer up front. In addition I've not been able to find any case of a creditor winning against a Nevis trust.

Oh - and they don't have any taxes. That will mean different things depending on your residency. But if you moved to a tax haven for example, theres no taxes at home or in Nevis company. If you live in a western high taxed country, there will likely be CFC laws etc that force you to declare info and income to be taxed as though it was local. If not or you're in a tax haven, the only tax you'll pay is on income made physically in another taxed country. For example if your company owns property in Germany and earns rental income, the company will need to pay german tax while the profit you've made trading non-real property like shares, crypto etc will be tax free.

Bit of a rant but hopefully that clears some of it up!
 
Last edited:
The general concept is that a Trust owns a company (IBC/LLC) and that company owns all the assets to be protected. You are appointed as manager of the company but the trust owns it. You don't own anything, but you control the company and therefore the underlying assets. You as manager can take money out of the company as a wage/loan etc however documented in your operating agreement or resolutions made.

Now choosing a Trustee is obviously important because they become the legal owner of the company and will therefore have the right to remove you as manager etc. You can reserve certain powers as the settlor or put in provisions for beneficiaries however you need to be careful about doing so, and if done, how much power you give these people. If you give yourself as much power as the Trustee, a court will definitely rule the trust a sham and place your assets back up for grabs as personal assets. - I found a case where this happened in Cook Islands.

A good way to combat this is is to appoint a protector. The protector basically oversees the trustee and has the power to over ride their decisions, remove and appoint new trustees etc. You should have one - there's only a few good cases to not have a protector. Again though, don't give them too much power or they could simply remove the trustee and appoint themself for example.

A quick word on dishonest trustees - it's very rare that they simp[y steal your stuff. Instead what they more often do (if dishonest) is manufacture arguments between beneficiaries, legal battles etc so that they can charge huge fees and slowly, yet legally drain your assets.

Anyway, so essentially when a creditor comes chasing you, you dont own the trust assets (the company or company's assets) so they are protected. The only way to get the trust assets included for consideration by a court is to prove that the trust structure was a sham, illegal or not valid for any reason. This is why you don't give yourself too much power. Keep in mind, simply having a revocable trust means you are able to make changes and therefore is poor asset protection. Revocable trusts are great for estate planning however. Irrevocable trusts however are very permanent in nature so be sure before doing so. There are ways to make changes or dissolve them but it's tougher and thats generally a power that only the protector should have.

Now all of these structures for further protection should be setup offshore in a jurisdiction with a good history/reputation/trust & company law. For extra protection, the trust and company can be two separate jurisdictions, provisions can be added like a flight clause, trustees refusal to act if under duress, removal of managers if action occurs etc. Further, diversification is alway good principle. If you have a high-risk business, you could hold it under the same Trust but as a separate company from the one that just holds your money, houses etc. That way if the company is sued directly, the other company is untouchable and you "may" even be able to move some of the high risk company's assets directly to the trust for protection.

As mentioned above, Nevis and Cook Islands are two often touted as the best. Nevis IMO wins out slightly. Their law specifically states that they do not recognize foreign judgements, that a local Nevis lawyer must hear the case in Nevis (which is tough because a good lawyer always works for the trust companies), the creditor must post up a bond before even taking action (I've often heard 100k but reading their actual law it states 25k), there is a very short statue of limitation for courts to even hear a case (often 1 year, sometimes 2) and the burden of proof is on the creditor and is at the highest possible standard of "beyond all reasonable doubt". Nevis highly regards privacy with nothing being public, the statute of Elizabeth is specifically written out of their law, spendthrift provisions are enforced and Lawyers have to work on retainer up front. In addition I've not been able to find any case of a creditor winning against a Nevis trust.

Oh - and they don't have any taxes. That will mean different things depending on your residency. But if you moved to a tax haven for example, theres no taxes at home or in Nevis company. If you live in a western high taxed country, there will likely be CFC laws etc that force you to declare info and income to be taxed as though it was local. If not or you're in a tax haven, the only tax you'll pay is on income made physically in another taxed country. For example if your company owns property in Germany and earns rental income, the company will need to pay german tax while the profit you've made trading non-real property like shares, crypto etc will be tax free.

Bit of a rant but hopefully that clears some of it up!
This post is awesome, thanks.

How limited are you when it comes to banking in this case? I doubt banks are like "sure this Nevis trust is a shareholder pleasure to have you"
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDX
This post is awesome, thanks.

How limited are you when it comes to banking in this case? I doubt banks are like "sure this Nevis trust is a shareholder pleasure to have you"
Banking is a pain everywhere these days! A structure in Nevis, with or without a trust, will have plenty of options in the Caribbean but likely find it very tough in Europe. That’s just Nevis, and most tax havens really, and I don’t believe the Trust on its own would ring any alarm bells. They’re pretty common practice. You might have better luck with a European company being owned by the Nevis trust but I’m just speculating there.
 
You might have better luck with a European company being owned by the Nevis trust but I’m just speculating there.
but if the bank figures our that the European company is owned by a Trust in Nevis they will behave as would it be a Nevis company and most often not open an account for any of your entities, or am I wrong?
 
but if the bank figures our that the European company is owned by a Trust in Nevis they will behave as would it be a Nevis company and most often not open an account for any of your entities, or am I wrong?
Not necessarily wrong yet at the same time it again depends on your story/background.

If you are an international player there will be banks working with you. If you are not it might be difficult.

Keep in mind that the trust (company/ies officers) become(s) responsible for the bank account opening (and keeping open) activities.

This among others will mean that they will become involved in the accounts. If you were creative beforehand it’s highly unlikely you can continue such behavior as the trust company will not want to have anything to do with it.

In many cases - with the exception of liabilities / estate planning - you don’t need international structures. Your home countries tax laws give enough room to play around and in that way you keep your bank accounts open and affordable.

Playing the international game used to be breaking even from around 100k turnover per year. Right now it isn’t beneficial below 500k unless you specifically need and want it based on your personal situation and don’t care that much about costs.

sounds like you know about it, where would you setup such Trust, I mean, I read it all over the forum, but where would it be most secure to set this up?

Also I have not millions but a few hundred thousand euro I have.
Nevis and cooks have been mentioned. Depending again on your personal wants and needs cayman could be added or closer to home even one of the Channel Islands or Cyprus.

Money wise I highly doubt it is worth to put it in a trust. A private foundation might be more cost beneficial. For those Panama is still one of the best (Ie cheapest) solutions.

Again; it all depends on your story, wants and needs. ( you mention Switzerland, don’t just contact someone via the internet. That will not work out for you. You need to take into account how Swiss authorities / legislators look at it. Contact local lawyers for consultation first ).
 
Last edited:
The fact is that if a trust is done correctly for tax purposes, the settlor loses all power over the assets of the trust -- other than whatever influence he has with the trustee. Although rare, things can go horribly wrong.

There was a high-profile case a while back where a wealthy family lost complete control over a huge amount of wealth place in a family trust. I do not have the time to research it. It involved either Switzerland or Liechtenstein, both of which are known for their rule of law.

For example:
Liechtenstein: The mysterious tax heaven that's losing the trust of the super-rich

The tiny principality of Liechtenstein attracts the super-rich for its secrecy and security but, as a bitter legal case shows, there's a price: all legal right are held by the trustees

However, what is less well known is that this secrecy comes with a heavy price – under Liechtenstein law the beneficiaries of a discretionary offshore trust have no legal rights. If there is a dispute with the trustees, the grievances of the beneficiaries cannot be heard in legal proceedings – even if they have reasonable grounds to challenge a trustee’s actions. Under the laws of the principality, legal rights are held by the trustees. And so if there is a dispute with the trustees, the beneficiaries can be left with no access to their own assets.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...neficiaries-trustees-legal-laws-a8239956.html
 

John D. Rockefeller made an important statement once – Own nothing, but control everything. Coming from someone with incredible wealth, this aspect has been thoroughly analyzed overtime and has become a top rule for handling money.

What he meant is fairly simple to understand. If you do not own anything, it means it cannot be taken away from you. This is what asset protection truly means, and believe it or not, it can be done legally. Most people simply forget about this aspect, though.
View attachment 3439

Back in the early 1990s, only a few people knew how asset protection truly works. With time, the popularity of this concept grew, so by the late 1990s, most millionaires had some clues about asset protection – it started spreading overnight.

The idea? What you do not own cannot be taken away from you – simple as that.

Own nothing but control everything – A few examples

Here is how the industry works.​


You and your partner have a new baby – Mary. You give Mary $25,000 for her college fund – just to help her get a good start in life. Later on, you end up in debt, and creditors come knocking on your door. Can a creditor get the money you gave to Mary?

No, they cannot. The money is a gift for Mary and is not a fraudulent convenient. At this point, Mary is the new owner, and since she is not a guarantor, she cannot be involved in the process. She will never be held accountable for your financial mistakes.

If the money is under Mary’s name, there is nothing to be worried about. Meanwhile, you can make various payments, trade with it, buy holidays, make a mortgage payment or perhaps start a business. You can do anything, despite the money not being owned by you.

Furthermore, you can make more transfers to entities in your asset protection trust without losing control.

Here is another example. You get a brand new Audi, and you take some friends out. You park it in front of their house and talk about it for a few minutes. They both work in the police, so they have some credibility in terms of law enforcement.

Now, imagine a homeless man walking by with a bag. Something sharp in that bag scratches your brand new car. You have some good witnesses, and you even have the homeless man not trying to run away. But then, what can you do?

He only has the clothes he is wearing, as well as whatever rubbish he has managed to find in that bag. Even if you take him to court, you will get nothing. This man owns nothing. He will not be arrested for it, and he has no physical address – you are only wasting your time and money.

This is pretty much the concept of own nothing, but control everything. Of course, you do not want to end up homeless. But then, there are legal procedures to ensure you can accumulate wealth without risking to lose it.

How the wealthy rely on trusts to preserve wealth​


Some of the richest families or dynasties in the world own nothing, but they somehow seem to control lots of wealth. If you think about it for a second, why would you do that? That is actually the secret to long term wealth – the type of wealth achieved over generations.

Owning too much may not be an issue, but a small mistake can seriously damage your wealth. On the same note, even if you manage to control money affairs, one of your successors may not have the same business spirit and throw everything down the drain.

Whether you think about the Rockefeller family or perhaps the Rothschild family, such families control billions. Their wealth is simply impressive. Do they own anything? No. John D. Rockefeller was not joking when he said you should own nothing, but control everything.




This is how rich people ensure their wealth is not lost, but maintained and grown over multiple generations. Everything is owed to the people who created these dynasties and came up with the first steps in terms of wealth.

They were clever. They knew kids born in wealth might make terrible decisions. There are numerous temptations associated with money, and many of them are nothing but scandalous mistakes. This is why their wealth was placed in foundations and trust.

The best part about this concept is that no one actually owns the wealth. The ownership is confusing and vague – less likely to be affected by legal issues. Different trusts also have different rules regarding who can touch the wealth or how distributions are made.

A brief history of trusts​


Trusts originally came to life in England. The Chancery Court gathered together a bunch of clever judges who decided that while some people may own property, someone else could benefit from it. It was unusual and confusing, but it was the base of what we see today.

The actual owner was referred to as a trustee. As for the beneficial user, they were known as the beneficiary. This law originated in the 12th century, and it persisted overtime – in fact, it was enhanced until it became what it is today.

Its popularity grew throughout the crusades. If a landowner had to leave the country to fight in such crusades, someone else was entrusted to manage the affairs while they were away. In return, the property would get back to the original owner.

Now, some trustees decided to go against the law, and after managing land for years, they decided they wanted to keep it. After all, it was their own work, and they actually deserved a part of what was built there.

The Lord Chancellor would then be petitioned for the so-called land return. Returning crusaders were always given the right of way. In other words, the trustee was supposed to return the land to the beneficiary when requested. This is how modern trust was created.

Modern uses for today’s trusts​


These days, trusts are used with a similar, yet different purpose. Basically, their modern role is to preserve wealth. They are associated with families, rather than individuals. Simply put, assets achieved in one way or another are donated to the trust.

At that point, the donor no longer owns those assets legally, so they cannot be held responsible for them should any situations arise. Even as a beneficiary, there are certain rules associated with each trust out there.

For instance, you could come up with a trust for further generations. You can also set up a trust for charitable distributions on a regular basis. At that point, you can also control the trustees, so you decide for yourself when distributions are made.

You have full control of these assets, but from a legal point of view, you do not own them.

This is exactly what John D. Rockefeller meant when he said own nothing, but control everything.

When everything you have managed to gather overtime is held in a trust, the trust can lend you money and ensure you support your current lifestyle. You cannot be taxed on the respective money if you choose to pay a commercial interest rate.

No one can seize these assets if you end up in trouble with creditors.​


The same rule applies if you end up in an ugly divorce – your partner cannot seize anything.

Bank balances can get out of trouble, too, as they should not be reported based on FACTA or CRS rules. After all, they are not your assets. This is another secret wherefore rich people stay rich for multiple generations and pay little to nothing in tax.

Now, unlike most expectations, it is important to know that foundations and trusts are more than just some clever and legal ways to disguise who owns your assets. Sure, no one will know, but further strategies take things even further.

These things change the actual ownership in terms of legal matters. For example, you could have control over $1M in assets, without owning anything at all. You can live in a fancy mansion owned by a business that is owned and run by the trust – no one will be bothered.

The trust will also lend you money on a regular basis, so you can take care of all your expenses. You can travel by private jets instead of commercial airlines. You can live in the biggest house in your town and hang around like a millionaire – all these without owning anything.

At the same time, imagine your partner filing for divorce. Sadly for them, if your wealth is held in trust, they would not be able to get anything. They can hire the most experienced lawyers in the world – they cannot enter a trust.

Bottom line, trust will offer more than just privacy. It does not come with any accounting rules – no disclosure laws either. Nobody will really know what the trust owns. Disguising assets has never been easier, and the good news is everyone has access to such things.

Becoming judgment proof with a trust​


Get your assets in offshore trust, and you will become immune to any court judgment. No lawyer, judge, or court will ever be able to steal anything from you – something that is quite common in today's society anyway.

More and more people hope for fat paychecks when they divorce. Then, if a company is large enough or an individual is rich, chances are someone out there will try to steal their money with some random lawsuits. These things happen on a daily basis.

It does pay off choosing the optimal jurisdiction if you decide on establishing a trust abroad. Sure, most people will not be aware of all these things, so they can still try. But as they hire lawyers, a professional will be able to check your assets – owning nothing means you can chase them away.

If you think about it, no one will pour a fortune into a law firm if the outcome is not certain.

Things can get even better if your trust is in a jurisdiction that is known to be hostile to creditors. Some creditors may go beyond the borders to try their luck, but certain countries out there have extremely strict rules against such things. Seeing such a country will put most people off.

Obviously, for such things to work, you need to ensure that visible assets are mortgaged with loans from a company that runs under the trust. This way, lawyers or creditors cannot seize assets in your original country either.

Good jurisdictions to establish offshore trusts


Here are some of the best jurisdictions chosen by those who want to hide wealth in trusts.

  • Cook Islands – known for having some of the strictest trust rules in the world, these semi independent islands can repel aggressive creditors with no issues at all. For maximum protection, assets should be in the trust for more than two years.
  • Panama – asset protection is fairly simple if you choose a foundation in Panama. The high level of confidentiality is not to be overlooked either. Fines for leaks are quite high and may even lead to prison, so no one really bothers with such things.

Now that you understand the concept of owning nothing but controlling everything, is it really worth it? The above-mentioned benefits make this structure ideal to ensure wealth is preserved, but there are also some potential problems you should be aware of.

Taxes associated with transparency​


These days are different from the days when Rockefellers used to grab wealth like there was no tomorrow. These days, there are automatic exchanges that share information, so governments can get more details about your actual assets – even if they are stored in other countries.

If you are trying to avoid tax like wealthy families decades ago, it is less likely to happen today. Indeed, you will gain some protection, but you cannot avoid tax completely. Other countries have professional tax authorities too. Putting money in someone else’s name without reporting it could be an issue.

In the USA, you need to report accounts even if you only get a beneficial interest. If your signature has control over that money, it must be reported. Most other countries are not as strict, though, but the USA could be a real problem.

The idea that you could hide some money in an offshore account is not always viable. Many jurisdictions collaborate to prevent tax evasion. Indeed, if you pay your taxes and follow the rules, your protection is still in place.

Indeed, you will pay more today than what you had to pay decades ago.

But then, you can still benefit from asset protection in front of problematic lawsuits.

Defining asset protection​


In theory, authorities cannot go after you if you do not own anything. If your name is not listed on an account, it is not yours. However, over the past few decades, there have been a few exceptions here and there.

Normally, no one can chase you for something that is not yours. But then, some judges have looked at the substance and circumstances, rather than the actual paperwork. A good lawyer can prevent all these things, though.

When putting people in charge of what you actually own, some judges may still link things to you. But these things are irrelevant if there is no major crime. Sure, if money comes from selling cocaine and can be linked to you, chances are you will get in trouble.

The general idea is fairly simple to understand. While you do gain some asset protection, not having anything in your name will still make your assets taxable. Avoiding tax is difficult, but as long as you pay what you owe, there should be no problems at all.

A few words about privacy​


Privacy was one thing 30 years ago and a completely different thing today. While there are still plenty of tax havens to help optimize tax, the truth is you can no longer hide money – as in promoting tax evasion. This is a thing of the past.

More and more tax havens have now started complying with international laws. They are more transparent than ever. Indeed, they will share your details if needed, but you can still move your business operations to another country to pay 3% instead of 19%, for example.

This is perfectly legal.​


On the other hand, hiding completely is almost impossible these days. Owning a company without anyone to know is hard, yet trust can make the information ambiguous. Some corporate registrars are open to the whole world – such as the one in the UK.

Technology does not help too much either. The whole world is interconnected now, so countries are open when it comes to business registrations. There are new rules to respect in tax havens too, yet you can still save a fortune.

Privacy is critical if you want to own nothing, but control everything. Privacy is still there in terms of the available information, but being completely anonymous is a thing of the past. If your goal is to avoid taxation, that is illegal.

Now, a trust can still hide who owns companies or the people behind the trust. But certain tax is still paid.

Potential operational issues​


Operational issues can be avoided if you know how to handle your money or who to work with. For instance, dealing with high-quality institutions asks for a large budget, but it will also make your life easier in the long run.

This is one of those cases where having $100M is much easier than having $5M only.

Implementing the concept to own nothing, but control everything implies having structures. There is nothing wrong with that. But then, the more structures you run, the more complicated your venture will be – plus, expenses may add up.

Other than that, you will find banks that have specialized in trusts and similar structures. Affluent people will most likely go into the commercial category if they operate through a trust. There will be more paperwork and bureaucracy then.

Now, the point is to avoid getting involved with things you do not understand. Do your homework, research, read and become familiar with systems. If you think you can be one of those people you see in movies with 50 offshore companies with different names in the middle of nowhere, you are wrong.

This rule does not apply to trusts only, but to anything related to the offshore industry.

Once you dig deeper and get involved, you realize that there will be new ongoing expenses and further fees. As a general rule of thumb, the simpler your structure is, the better you will be. You need to keep things simple, so you can understand everything without any headaches.

Finally, if your concept of own nothing, but control everything is about creating luxurious lifestyles with fancy mansions and fast cars, you might fail – unless you already have millions. If you are new to this game, you might be disappointed by the outcome.

Instead, you need to do things bit by bit. Get in from scratch and grow from there while you still educate yourself. As you get more money, you will have more complications and so on. Doing things slowly can keep you on track without risking your hard earned money.

Conclusion​


As a short final conclusion, the idea to own nothing, but control everything is definitely an appealing one. It used to work wonders decades ago, but things have changed a lot lately. It is not as easy as it used to be, yet running your assets through a trust can still bring in a plethora of advantages.

From protecting your assets and hiding identities to reducing tax, such things can still be done. But then, everything must be done within the law. If you hope to avoid tax completely by running a company in an exotic location, you are breaking the law, so it is out of the discussion.

This was a really good read Thanks. I've just started out small and now realized that the smallest mistake could be costly.
 
Yes indeed, doing your homework as many here already have said, is crucial. You can avoid a lot of trouble. I'm glad to read that you find the information interesting.

Enjoy your stay thu&¤#
 
I try to follow advice from this article. Still can't get the puzzle together when it comes to protecting my bank assets.
 
Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.