Most likely they just rely on you information they get from the card provider itself. Would not have been defensive, if not have seen how Valet (ex-
advcash) handled the same issue with Union Pay cards and they were issued by PH-based issuer as well, so can correlate between two situations based on my industry intelligence, that's it.
Not quite sure what you mean if it isn't
"everybody should first ask me whatever they intend to undertake"
I can also follow you in your statement re. the ex-USSR clients and their complex business. It's always more or less risky to do business with someone you don't know. If nobody would be willing to take any risk you would have no clients, right ?
Mind, I didn't come here only to complain but also to find out if there were many others caught in this scam,
because that is a scam. When you have in hand a card UnionPay, an authentic one, of course, and it works OK you think the deal is fair, because it could have been worse, no need to say that. So, was the scam more elaborate, i.e. the card stops working when you put some more money on it, that is still to be investigated.
Did you try to contact issuer of the card? Does your legal agreement with issuer imply it's some sort of OffshoreWealth venture, or branding?
Yes, I did but they all tell the same story - a security issue that it takes time to solve, etc. Well, you can believe it for some time but eventually enough is enough. In fact, there are several layers but the end issuer (The Bank) is supposed to be a large UP card issuer and I'd rather think of
some contract breech between Offshore Pro / International Wealth and the Bank, the latter is not willing to disclose and they have agreed on a narrative.
No, the card doesn't look like a sub-brand. It looks just like an ordinary UP card with no name on it. However, at the Bank it's registered as "No Name" and, consequently, the Bank, yet knowing my identity, does not consider it's abnormal to issue a "No-name" card. The supposed breech must be elsewhere.