Gentlemen with all my respect and sympathy, "a lawyer told me", " a friend told me" , "I read on the internet" "the cousin of my friend's son in law told me" this is how urban legends are born. It s very simple: this is a businessmen forum and anonimous. How come there is not ONE person to write "yes it s me, the tax office followed me through facial recognition software and my cell phone signal" Maybe because there is not such a thing? (yet) What will happen next, you will be abducted by alliens?
What I mentioned is not an urban legend. It is a real case where the person claimed to be tax resident in a
tax haven while still often visiting his home country. They used card statements, neighbours and highway toll gate records against him. It went through three courts (local court, regional court and supreme administrative court).
This happened in 2014 and it was about €4k. Let that sink in, 6 years ago, today you have better data, better reporting, better technology.
I can send you the real court decision PDF if don't trust me and want proof (PM me if interested) though I'm not sure if it will help you as it is 10 non-English pages of law speak. He didn't go to jail but he had to pay back taxes + interest + a fine.
I'm very surprised with this. I don't think this is possible because taxmen are slow. Not all highways toll gateways take pictures, and when they do, they don't keep them for long. I think all data is deleted after 7 days, maybe 30 days, no more. In the EU countries I know, this data is only available to the police, when they look for a criminal. In what country did this happen?
Finally, there's a big difference between MC and oppressive states. People trust Prince Albert. He just want his country to be very safe. Nobody has ever been arrested for dubious or arbitrary reasons in MC.
Yes it is possible. You can never count on data being "truly deleted". The same applies to the new passenger information
exchange system valid from 2019. Officially they claim that the data will be "
anonymized" after 6 months so that older information cannot be obtained, however how exactly that deanonymization looks and why keep anonymized data at all remains a mystery. Or maybe not a mystery, they just don't want to say this data will be available forever from now on.
By the way "data only available to the police" is nonsense. Usually police and state prosecutor work hand in hand (against the individual) with presumption of guilt. Only when you get to court there should be presumption of innocence. What can happen is the tax office automatically reports suspicion of fraud/
tax evasion (the office is forced by law to report it), police can investigate, police gets permission from prosecutor which is usually just a formality. Then they get all the data they want.
And the situation is even worse than you can imagine a) in
China and b) in "golden cage" countries such as Monaco, Saudi etc. Even the situation in the UK is insane, get on a bus and there are 7 cameras inside.