Thailand has territorial taxation and no
CFC rules so they
could have developed a good tax regime for
crypto as
@zzzzzz was thinking. Instead they took the "crypto is always with you" approach that
@Bagpacker mentions.
Previously there was a lot of uncertainty there about crypto. The Central Bank of Thailand kept changing its mind about it and the Revenue Department had no clear direction. That is why I got out.
The comparison I make to Georgia is that the direction here has been more positive - each new announcement is more friendly. Of course that could change under pressure from
OECD, EU or USA and I expect it will one day - certainly when it comes to the zero-
KYC crypto ATMs. Georgian commercial banks don't want to deal with companies involved in crypto yet, which keeps some buffer between crypto traders and the "international financial system". But this can change too. Yesterday the
Prime Minister met with SBF and
Tweeted about the "stable & favourable business environment", aiming for the world's second biggest
crypto exchange to set up here.
From
Agenda.ge:
Malta made the mistake of over-announcing crypto-friendliness while being a money laundering centre and ended up being crypto-unfriendly in most regards. Georgia's approach is different, and
could stay positive for natural persons while giving better support to crypto businesses and attracting inward investment - and good jobs in the way that online gambling has (evolution are constantly advertising for staff).
I am interested in
@JohnnyDoe's comments about The Bahamas. The location is more convenient for some than others, but there are certainly plus points about living there and The Bahamas are supported by all major exchanges, unlike Georgia and UAE that lack access to Gemini and Coinbase for example.