yeah, sure, they are that stupid...If the bank asks why does it come from a casino, just simply say you'r working for the casino.
I just want to challenge you, what would be wrong with that if it was possible to setup?So you are suggesting to "Frank" to put his hard earned money in a structure held by a Seychelles company created with a UBO using "darks".
Exactly. I don't see any problem with that. The funds are clean. No terrorism funding. No tax evasion technically.I just want to challenge you, what would be wrong with that if it was possible to setup?
probably depends on the definition of "darks" - if you understand it the same way I do then investing money to (say) real estate held by a Seychelles company owned (on paper) by someone else (possibly non-existent person) is hardly acceptableI don't see any problem with that.
I'd rather use darks of a nonexistent person than an existing one. He/she can control the company. There's a big risk with that.probably depends on the definition of "darks" - if you understand it the same way I do then investing money to (say) real estate held by a Seychelles company owned (on paper) by someone else (possibly non-existent person) is hardly acceptable
if you meant it another way, please explain
This is my point exactly. The real Frank behind this case would think I'm nuts suggesting something like this.You would hold REAL WORLD assets like Real Estate or decent size amount of bank deposits in a fictional person? What if the bank asks you to show up in person?
Then register the company to frank's name as UBO. He can use nominees as director and shareholder. UBO name will be a secret. With an IBC frank can keep money in the reserve without spending it in the end of the year. Can't say anything about taxes without knowing frank's tax residence.This is my point exactly. The real Frank behind this case would think I'm nuts suggesting something like this.
Forget that the source of money is gambling (which is btw for no reason considered high-risk "business" nowadays, the more if you are the gambler and not casino). The case is technically the same as if he would be a successful entrepreneur exiting his company for big money. Now he wants to keep his privacy and as anonymously as possible invest the money (meaning not to hold everything in cash in one currency). You can't seriously tell him to get fake documents and use some another identity (do you know "Breaking bad"? ).
I can accept there is no other way in our times, but I need to be sure there isn't and it would be also mean that "the end of the world" is coming...
what do you think Milky? would you find some time to give us some opinion?I'll respond during the weekend.