Aren't funds the biggest loser in a big downtrend because nearly all of them buy the exact same stocks?Why not just put your money in a low-cost S&P 500 index fund like SPY, VOO & IVV?
the peak of bonds has not been reached and it will take some years to reach it as the second high inflation is to come after the deflation which will create a hard landing and in the end money printing .That's not a bad idea, sure.
However, my preference would be long term (>10 years). In a year from now people will be wondering why they didn't take up this "once in a lifetime chance" on the bond market.
The big diffrence of today is that markets have been inflated via money printing.True, however over decades you can regularly find in the news (with right arguments) that stock markets are overvalued.
Markets could indeed tank (and not recover for a long period) tomorrow, next month or in 2030... who knows?
"Past performance is no guarantee of future results." goes both ways too.
At the end of the day, when you estimate you have "done your own research" and "due diligence" extensively enough, you may decide that "time in the market beats timing the market". To each his quotes.
Unless you know a reliable fortune teller, investments are matters of substantiated conviction closely linked to your degree of risk aversion.
Currently they are deleveraging.At one point it will go only one direction over years which is down.
China and Russia already dumping their bonds.It's better to invest in government bonds because
Treasury bonds are low-risk investments that are generally risk-free when held to maturity since being backed government makes the odds of default extremely low.
Last edited: