The program was never intended for people who are still "active". NHR is for retirees who receive a pension, bank interest, perhaps a few dividends.
I don't know why so many people are attracted by this NHR - must have to do with internet chit-chat were wrong expectation were set right from the start.
Ahm? Maybe I'm doing this totally wrong, but I moved from Netherlands to Portugal as a freelancer under the NHR (with "high value added activity"). All my clients are still Dutch.
And essentially my main "state expenses" are now:
10% social security + 15% income tax (20% tax over 75% of revenue) over my revenue. I pay no VAT on business expenses. I also pay 0 EUR in public health insurance which works in all of the EU countries + CH + NO for emergencies.
So essentially I pay 25% to the Portuguese state over my revenue with 0 health insurance expenses.
This is WAY better than where I come from: Netherlands. With my income there I would pay 40 to 50% in income taxes, excluding social security, excluding 1500 EUR yearly in health insurance costs (and if I need healthcare you can easily add another 1500 EUR to that). Not to mention everything is way cheaper in Portugal. The kicker: my administrative burden has probably been reduced by like 99% compared to the Dutch situation (incredibly time consuming subsidies and company/tax administration for tech freelancers there).
Am I doing something wrong? Is there a better deal to be had somewhere? I'm not really bound to any country personally, no family, easy to move in a heartbeat.