I also read it, one of the best description of what was lying ahead
jesus christ the WSB autists had figured it out perfectly 4 months ago, madness !
I am not so sure... 140% of the float was simply shortedit's not really about retail using options, retail is trading spot to push the price up, hedge funds are the ones shorting via options
An entire generation of autists have just learned the timeless wisdom of Bernard Baruch: "you can never go broke taking a profit"
its like you can't buy the stock on any of those retail brokers, insane !
now the shorts have not been covered still though if I am not mistaken, technically this could bounce back up as fast lol
I can't wait to see how this ends, hopefully those crooky hedge funds bleed to death
the plumbing of the entire financial system is cracking and everyone is getting aware of the manipulations by those f*****s, I would do it again If I could!It's your time to shine, if you liked it at $450 you must LOVE it at $102... now is your time to go all in!
The only way redditors could push the price so high was by buying call options (which then force the broker to actually buy the stocks). That's how you can push the price higher without having a ton of $$$.
You buy 1 call option - gives you the option to buy 100 stocks at a certain OTM price - then the broker has to buy these stocks to reserve it (in case price goes up and you actually want to exercise the option).
As far as I understand, if you buy a CALL you get the option to buy 100 of the stock at a certain price. The person that sold you that option is obligated to give you these stocks when they reach that price (if you exercise the option). I could be wrong though, as I'm not a options pro.With respect, this isn't how it works. If you buy a call option, the other side of your trade is typically taken by a market maker. There is much written about how market makers work (and its not an obligation to buy the underlying physcial) so probably best to google that rather than me cut and paste here.
Yes, that part is right, the option is the right but not the obligation to transact at the agreed price.As far as I understand, if you buy a CALL you get the option to buy 100 of the stock at a certain price. The person that sold you that option is obligated to give you these stocks when they reach that price (if you exercise the option). I could be wrong though, as I'm not a options pro.
I have to disagree with you. An option market maker does not want a fully naked exposure, so they buy a certain percentage of their exposure on the open market (20, 30, 40 shares). When you are facing an enormous loss, you could be sure that they will hedge themselves fully - otherwise they will lose millions and millions. See It's Not Just Robinhood, Reddit Rebellion Has Clogged Entire Financial System's Plumbing | ZeroHedgeYes, that part is right, the option is the right but not the obligation to transact at the agreed price.
The incorrect part is that the broker is forced to then buy the 100 shares that you *may* be long should you exercise...and your ability to exercise is also dependent on the kind of option. The market maker will manage his book for *everything* that is on his book to retain a largely neutral stance. If he has sold you calls but has also sold puts to someone else at the same strike then the two hedge each other off and the market maker doesn't need to do anything. This example is simplistic but I trust you see my point. There are myriad ways in which the market make will manage his book that may or may not involve the underlying physical.
Hope it helps.
part 2 of the video.
Chamath the legend !
RIP Chamath and all the morons following him that are now watching their portfolio down 50%
I love this guy, talking about diamond hands while he's selling his stocks like a madman