Euro Pacific bank is a scam

[ATNTESTING]

I can confirm that they contacted me today to provide documentation of my EPB accounts.

Can you give me the email address of the one who contacted you?
So they contacted you last week and me, nothing. Why am I not surprised?

 

[regi]

This is getting very fishy!

It was a long time ago before people started speaking directly.

 

[James123456]

What bothers me the most is people thinking I should not even file my lawsuit as it may delay the return of customer funds, that will eventually be returned. I lost over $17 million that will never be returned. Plus I was falsely accused of helping organized criminals launder money and evade taxes by corrupt government officials and a complicit media. I have a right to clear my name and seek damages. Instead of being mad at me, be made at them. An innocent bank and all of its customers were sacrificed for a publicity stunt. The J5 got to publicize its first enforcement "success" and the OCIF Commissioner got to clean up Puerto Rico's banking reputation by winning the public praise of the IRS and other J5 Chiefs.

if an authority puts a bank into liquidation (a forced one in epb case) the liquidators job is to liquidate the bank meaning distribute the remaining assets and close it. That’s it . It is NOT the liquidators job (his fiduciary duty) to assess whether the bank could be rescued by selling It to new owners. Hence your argument against the receiver is flawed. Of course if you can prove in court that the receiver has been enriching himself due to illicit spendings and/or delaying on purpose , that is another thing. But your argument that the receiver must assess potential buyers is flawed. No one has said it Isn’t your right to sue and I don’t think anyone has said either you shouldn’t sue - you are simply being challenged as you are not 100% accurate including first stating further up that you sued the receiver “personally “ and then later saying you sued him “in his professional capacity only “.

 

[Pschiff]

if an authority puts a bank into liquidation (a forced one in epb case) the liquidators job is to liquidate the bank meaning distribute the remaining assets and close it. That’s it . It is NOT the liquidators job (his fiduciary duty) to assess whether the bank could be rescued by selling It to new owners. Hence your argument against the receiver is flawed. Of course if you can prove in court that the receiver has been enriching himself due to illicit spendings and/or delaying on purpose , that is another thing. But your argument that the receiver must assess potential buyers is flawed. No one has said it Isn’t your right to sue and I don’t think anyone has said either you shouldn’t sue - you are simply being challenged as you are not 100% accurate including first stating further up that you sued the receiver “personally “ and then later saying you sued him “in his professional capacity only “.

You are wrong. Plus, potential buyers help customers and other creditors, as well as shareholders. As it stands now, due to the failure of the receiver to consider a sale of the bank, all customers may end up losing some money. Had he approved a sale, not only would no customer have lost a dime, but all would have had access to 100% of their deposits over two years ago. However, had he done that he would not have been able to excessively enrich himself over that time period. The receiver is not allowed to squander a bank's capital that may otherwise have been available to creditors or shareholders. What does that not upset you?