ePayments may have a hidden agenda, be warned.

[JohnSpain]

I helped a gambling company get an account with epayments and there have never been any problems. I think they are the only EMI I can think of that never caused any problems. Paysera for example closed down the account after a few transactions.

 

[JohnLocke]

I helped a gambling company get an account with epayments and there have never been any problems.

a Gambling company was approved by ePayments

 

[JohnSpain]

This was some years ago, but they kept the account open - I know its more difficult today

 

[bastard]

Can we say they suck big times and their compliance are retards? I think so. Can we say they are a honeypot? I don't know but it smells like s**t.

 

[CaLViN]

Just because they didnt like your business ,this doesnt mean they are scammers.
What you are saying is bulls**t actually OP.

 

[Spinat]

bulls**t or not epayment sucks! In my own experience I have found that they decline any type of business now I wonder why

 

[dohongnam]

If old businesses survive and new businesses are not accepted, then maybe they want a track record?

 

[happyjohn]

What you are saying is bulls**t actually OP.

Your opinion free speech long live. I stay with what I have said, ePayment is a joke and smells like a honeypot!

 

[Martin Everson]

You know the disclaimer when it comes to EMI account openings should be:

"Past performance is no guarantee of future results"

Slightly off topuc but on the wider subject of EMI/bank rejections anything from signing up via an IP address thats not in your claimed country of residence can get you rejected no matter what documents you provide. Due diligence is also opaque and inconsistant at best and the EU needs to set clear hard rules related specifically to financial institutions having to provide a comprehensive reason for rejection. Some EMI's etc are hiding behind discriminatory practices. Also in my opinion EU governments should be obligated to provide state controlled accounts for citizens who have no access to private sector banks and EMI's as if they get rejected with no clear reason then they will be forced to use cash and this will go against EU moving towards a cashless society.

Rant over

 

[JohnLocke]

I'm not sure if this is true or not but I believe it is claim against claim and no one will figure it out before it may be to late.

 

[moneyhoney]

a Gambling company was approved by ePayments

Actually I wrote them few months ago about a similar business and they told me this kind of business is ok with them. I mean their prolicy approves it.

 

[John Spectre]

Ha-Ha
Guys, don't repeats yourself again and again with same words.
Someone said epayments sucks, okay.
Someone said epayments good.
Everyone passes their own experience, why you are start to throw s**t on a fan and abuse people who have opposite experience? Literally saying, 5 people wrote own reviews for epayments here, but some of you are continue to shill and repeat your opinion for 2 pages with no new real information about proving for scam or no.
What kind of childhood desire to overthrow the other's user opinion?

 

[funk]

5 people wrote own reviews for epayments here, but some of you are continue to shill and repeat your opinion for 2 pages with no new real information about proving for scam or no.
What kind of childhood desire to overthrow the other's user opinion?

Intention is to get it ranked on google so that epayments might come to know about this and to force them to come here and address issues users are facing regarding application rejection. Lots of threads on this forum are very highly ranked on google.

 

[John Spectre]

R u sure think so?

You are really think, that any financial instituion ever would go to change own compliance rules and bussiness model based on reviews from site where first half of if discussing semi legal and grey things and second half is fully mired in things that are crime?
If they even come here, they just will conclude that their way is right.

 

[lrotter]

Who are "we" and what are the startups you are opening? bulls**t companies which suddenly get accepted by ePayments. Come on that's a big fat lies again from some random user at OCT!

We - team of consultants.
Don’t accuse other in a lie if they are more lucky or tried more efficient approaches.

 

[dohongnam]

Just got my ePayments business account approved after 5 weeks of submitting the documents. I really think what ePayments wants is an already established company and already generating revenue because I let ePayments log into my website to see the every day sale revenue.

 

[Spinat]

Just got my ePayments business account approved after 5 weeks of submitting the documents. I really think what ePayments wants is an already established company and already generating revenue because I let ePayments log into my website to see the every day sale revenue.

Thank you for the review. I don't trust this EMI any longer and moved on to the many other options around.

 

[Decanl]

I can put my opinion in here as well. It was a long process, roughly 5-6 weeks, but in the end, I did open a corporate account with Seychelles Company, they even did open a EMS for me.
I can definitely vouch for them, the customer service is great, the response times are great and overall my experience with ePayments is outstanding.

 

[Mark Rucken]

You are not the first nor the last person they rejected for no particular reason. They can do whatever they want. You sent them your KYC willingly knowing they might reject you. Spreading theories they are collecting KYC and re-selling it is a bit extreme IMO.

 

[extremedox101]

i agree with john , there are few issues in my opinion with epayments that make dangerous emi :


1. ask rogue questions which is not honest in nature, request as many documents for sake collecting data not letting users passing kyc .if they are not okay with the address , who in hell give his siblings documents as alternative (this red flag)??? furthermore don't respect privacy , because you signup up with them are going to tell them the history of your family ?
2. was not made for international market , just scale up the business later .
3. support isn't experienced yet take things too seriously .

this rule one does not trust customers it also mean they attract a lot of scammers from russia .