That is not true.
Based on a fbi report they were already in 2011 able to trace owners of 98% of all transaction done via bitcoin.
The trace doesn't need to be done via KYC.Its done somewhere else where noone thinks about it. or even thinks to hide.
That is not true.
If you want to make sure to not have to provide KYC or get yout assets frozen for whatever reason i recommend usind decentralized exchanges where non custodial trading is offered.Cannot say for sure.
Do they allow you to hold fiat? If yes, then probably report.
Did you provide full kyc? if yes, then probably report.
Hk is a reporting country, so probably also yes.
However you cannot be sure about the data quality and effectiveness.
But I would avoid this stress and look for other methods and or move to a banana republic or tax haven.
If you cannot afford tax havens, then at least go to a banana republic. They can also be nice.
Leger Nano is a solution ? or which decentralized exchanges ? Thank you
Dear god please no god no.Bringing your attention to this; g20 report tax ministers - https://www.oecd.org/tax/oecd-secretary-general-tax-report-g20-finance-ministers-april-2021.pdf
“The OECD will continue to work on the detailed technical proposals for the new tax reporting framework for crypto-assets, with a view to delivering a proposal to the G20 later in 2021.”
There will be a NEW reporting framework, and it will come sooner than we think.
Not sure what you're trying to hide (if anything), but I think a lot of cryptocurrency activity is going to move off of centralized exchanges in the near future. Instead, we'll see people use decentralized crypto-to-crypto protocols/exchanges more frequently (UniSwap / ThorChain / etc.). Besides, the use of peer-2-peer transactions to convert to/from fiat is going to increase; coordinated via decentralized, uncensorable mechanisms like Bisq.How to fix this? Just close all the exchange accounts? Convert your fiat in exchanges to stablecoins?
How do you exchange crypto for fiat on a DEX?Not sure what you're trying to hide (if anything), but I think a lot of cryptocurrency activity is going to move off of centralized exchanges in the near future. Instead, we'll see people use decentralized crypto-to-crypto protocols/exchanges more frequently (UniSwap / ThorChain / etc.). Besides, the use of peer-2-peer transactions to convert to/from fiat is going to increase; coordinated via decentralized, uncensorable mechanisms like Bisq.
Besides, mixing/obfuscation techniques are going to become much more user friendly and more widely adopted. This will make it more difficult to trace these types of transactions. Ultimately, governments will have no alternative but to go after developers of these decentralized systems. The most democratic jurisdictions will hopefully find it difficult to justify such extreme measures. Ideologically motivated developers will take risks and find ways to stay anonymous.
Ideally, the world will eventually become less reliant on fiat money as people realize that their governments patronize and surveil them like underage children. The Internet has given people access to knowledge and means to coordinate themselves across borders. I think the endgame is that governments will have to surrender to technology and acknowledge that they are no longer adding much value in the modern world. But that's just what my crystal ball is saying. We'll have to live in the current system for a bit longer, and the transition won't be smooth.
You may not want to. If you do, read the sentence that follows.How do you exchange crypto for fiat on a DEX?
I completely agree and just want to add that there were even talks about crowdfunding (CCS) physical protection for Monero devs for example. It's definitely possible govts will go after devs themselves.Not sure what you're trying to hide (if anything), but I think a lot of cryptocurrency activity is going to move off of centralized exchanges in the near future. Instead, we'll see people use decentralized crypto-to-crypto protocols/exchanges more frequently (UniSwap / ThorChain / etc.). Besides, the use of peer-2-peer transactions to convert to/from fiat is going to increase; coordinated via decentralized, uncensorable mechanisms like Bisq.
Besides, mixing/obfuscation techniques are going to become much more user friendly and more widely adopted. This will make it more difficult to trace these types of transactions. Ultimately, governments will have no alternative but to go after developers of these decentralized systems. The most democratic jurisdictions will hopefully find it difficult to justify such extreme measures. Ideologically motivated developers will take risks and find ways to stay anonymous.
Ideally, the world will eventually become less reliant on fiat money as people realize that their governments patronize and surveil them like underage children. The Internet has given people access to knowledge and means to coordinate themselves across borders. I think the endgame is that governments will have to surrender to technology and acknowledge that they are no longer adding much value in the modern world. But that's just what my crystal ball is saying. We'll have to live in the current system for a bit longer, and the transition won't be smooth.
You correct with a statement arguing for something different to what I answered
Oh men satoshi please stop spreading false information.Bitcoin is a bankers product and you still don't get it.Woah, that's next level. But a great idea. Love the Monero community's resiliency and ideological alignment.
I wish more of the developers would have stayed pseudonymous in the first place. It's what saved Satoshi. Governments would certainly have harassed him for something.
Only OTC is secure.You correct with a statement arguing for something different to what I answered
As I said the beauty of crypto is that you don't need to provide any KYC for most wallets, whether you can trace BTC to a anonymous wallet or not I don't question, but guarding your own privacy can let the FBI trace as much as you like they won't find you if you know what you are doing.
Even then the mall has security cameras and deep packet inspection for the free wifi...If you use internet an idea could be using a device which emei can't be traced to you and making the transactions in a mall with free wifi which doesn't need registration
Cyber gangs typically use WiFi antennas to crack Wifis far from their own location. Deep packet inspection doesn't help against E2E encryption.Even then the mall has security cameras and deep packet inspection for the free wifi...
not possible to track which person has done something if mutiple users use their wifi at the same timeEven then the mall has security cameras and deep packet inspection for the free wifi...
No Name SIM, You get a sim in so many countries without any document.Okay, following idea:
You setup a mobile WIFI in your car or boat, use a SIM without name for connecting to the net or you drive around in a city until you get connected on someone else home lan.
Now you can do whatever you want and it will not be traceable to you, or did I miss something?