Article 82.t has been translated in a way that it no longer reflects its true meaning. The first sentence of Article 82 (1) starts with: "The following types of income of natural persons shall be exempt from
income tax : ... ". Further down, subparagraph
t1 in the messed English translation indeed mentions "
income gained by a resident legal person". However, it should mean "
Income received from ...".
The example of subparagraph
t1 specifically refers to listings on the A- and B-Segment of the Georgian
Stock Exchange (GSE). This can be verified by checking subparagraph
t2 which refers to interest received from these GSE listed securities (mostly local bonds like
M2 or
Georgian Leasing).
Then comes subparagraph
t3. This one is used in connection with NBG ordinance 108/04.
The aforementioned is not so much about the exemption of foreign sourced income. It is about the exemption of Georgian sourced income which -at an earlier stage- had been foreign sourced income:
For many years it was a problem for Georgian local brokerage companies to be competitive when operating under a tax code that only qualifies Non-Georgian sourced income as tax exempt. If a Georgian tax resident opens an account with a Georgian local broker (white label),
dividends and capital gains from buy/sell operations would always be transformed into Georgian sourced income due to the fact that the Georgian broker receives everything in his account and then distributes to his clients on local sub-accounts.
The list of NBG ordinance 108/04 in connection with subparagraph
t3 eliminates that disadvantage to a certain degree.
An unintended consequence of the aforementioned is that it gives an additional layer of safety, even for somebody who only uses direct foreign based brokerage like
eToro or
NAGA.
This is a huge problem in Georgia: Present the very same case to six different lawyers and get six different answers. Same is valid for tax advise. It is the consequence of an extremely immature legal system.