So lets say you earn $100K dividends / royalties and you only remit 10K in Thailand.
Does this make you tax resident from US perspective?
The first paragraph of article 4 says "For the purposes of this Convention, the term "resident of a Contracting State" means
any person who, under the laws of that State, is liable to tax therein by reason of his domicile, residence, citizenship,place of management, place of incorporation, or any other criterion of a similar nature"
In any case, you don't have to convince me.
I know exactly
what could happen.
"
According to the Supreme Court, the fact that a U.K. resident non-domiciled is subject to U.K. tax only if he derives income from sources within the U.K., while no U.K. tax is collected on non-U.K. source income, unless and until that income is remitted to the taxpayer in the U.K., results in the taxpayer’s failing to me the Treaty’s tax residence test of article 4, par. 1). As a consequence, according to the Supreme Court, the Taxpayer could not be treated as resident of the U.K. under the definition of article 4, paragraph 1) of the Treaty, and the tie-breaker provision of paragraph 2) of the Treaty did not apply."
Don't even start the discussion "
yes but here we are talking about UK, Thailand is more relaxed and so on" because the discussion is not about Thailand but US.
Do you know why they drafted their treaties with that paragraph under article 4 and limitation on benefits?
Because they don't want you to f*ck with them.