Our valued sponsor

EU top court rules against Malta’s golden passport scheme

https://www.reuters.com/world/europ...nst-maltas-golden-passport-scheme-2025-04-29/

"The European Court of Justice on Tuesday said Malta needs to end its golden passport programme that allows wealthy foreigners to buy citizenship, as it is an infringement of EU law."

The reason why people are buying these passports is because banking systems are discriminate and build a risk profile according to your passport

So if you are African or South American then you are high risk even if you are legit thats why wealthy people are buying these passports so they rest its not about entering EU without visa or living there
 
  • Like
Reactions: Martin Everson
Although I am politically against mass immigration, I think wealthy people add a lot of value to a country, plus it is very good for a country's budget because these types of passports usually cost at least a million. Shame to see it abolished.
 
Well it is what you get for trying to stay in the EUSSR.

It will get shut — but not because it was ineffective, instead because it worked too well. It gave outsiders a legitimate fast-track into the communist fortress of Brussels, and that scared the bureaucrats. Surely no pretending it relates to “values” or “solidarity", it’s about increasing control. The program was (still is for the moment) simple: write a check, if you are not doing criminal activities, you get an EU passport. The leftist Eurocrats hated it because it let capital flow where it pleased, bypassing the endless gatekeeping and identity politics that dominate the European immigration racket. A self-made millionaire from Lagos or Shanghai (or Moscow, who cares!) could become as European as Mohammed from Paris (hahaha) and that broke their ideological narrative. They prefer to import terrorists and basic criminals on collapsing boats :)

Funnily the same EU that’s now crying about "commercialization of citizenship" has no issue when Portugal or Greece whore out long-term visas and residency to anyone with a few hundred grand for a downtown apartment. Those flows are controlled, slow, and taxed HARD. Malta gave people actual leverage — mobility, security, and access without kissing the ring (and beneficially no forced taxation LOL). That’s what got them in trouble.

It is no more than a political hit job, a small country used its sovereignty to punch above its weight, and the empire came knocking.

Power hates independence. And when you find a tool that actually gives you some — expect them to come for it.
 
It is no more than a political hit job, a small country used its sovereignty to punch above its weight, and the empire came knocking.

I agree. As an island nation with limited resources they are doing what pretty much many small islands do to generate revenue to help residents while ensuring the new incoming persons are rich enough not to be burden to society and in fact be a net positive economically.

I think certain EU countries like Germany are aggrieved by their own stupidity and Malta's success. Germany is a country that took in 1 million refugees between 2015-2016 from Iraq, Syria etc and 1.1m Ukrainian refugees up to 2024 - and maybe more now. That is a lot of people to house and I wonder if its a net negative socially and economically? I mean I would not visit a Christmas market in Germany any time soon without solid concrete barriers in place ns2.


Lets hope Malta finds a way to keep its golden passport by tweaking the program a little so it meets the "necessary bond of solidarity and good faith between a member state and its citizens, or to ensure mutual trust between member states" :rolleyes: