UAE clarification of Freezone Qualifying Income

Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.
Interesting analysis and debate.
Just thinking about some other consequences of this change. Given a couple of the freezone have their own judicial system,
If you had a tax "issue" would it be dealt with under Sharia law or the prevailing freezone legal system?
 
I am not UAE law expert but isn't 9% federal tax, so general law of UAE would be applied?
 
Actually, in Geneva they had a new law for the lump sum tax in 2016 and taxpayers with the old regime had a grandfathering clause of which they can continue to benefit (of the old regime) BUT it lasted 5 years.
https://www.bonnard-lawson.com/geneva-final-vote-lump-sum-taxation/Right now they need to meet the new criteria in order to further continue.

So yeah that's why I hardly believed you. So you say (correct me if I'm wrong) that lump sum taxpayers, who arrived before the abolition, can benefit in ZH for life? If yes, can you give me a source highlighting this clause?

EDIT: The grandfathering clause that I mentioned was for all cantons with the regime not only Geneva
 
Last edited:
Reactions: JohnLocke and bisk
I am not sure if I can post the name of the law firm you can hire for this since they do not advertise on OCT. It may be considered an advertisement by the mods. I'm NOT that lawyer, nor do I work for him. The lawyer who did this for me retired a while back right along with BSI.

If you get permission from the mods, I'll give you the link to the law firm's webpage. I don't want to be banned or ruin someone else's business opportunities.

The law firm can answer all your detailed questions and they can also provide you with official links.

@mods ???? I just realized I don't even know who the mods on here are
 

Yes, pros and cons with both options. I think the best solution is to have a dual setup with Dubai company and residency (For non EU-customers, banks, PSPs) and Cyprus company and residency (For EU-customers, banks, PSPs), spend winters in Dubai and summers in EU.
 
Reactions: jafo

This is off topic. So no link posting.


Please guys stick to thread topic...thx. Switzerland has nothing to do with this thread. I will start zapping off topic posts if it gets out of hand.
 
*This is actually a great idea/theory. If this is put into practice, I wonder what the results would be.

Theory -> Practice -> Results.

Has anyone tried this yet?
 
I would've waited for some clarification of CFC rules.
UAE and Cyprus have double taxation treaties, however the tax framework in UAE is, let's say, in its infancy and there might be some misunderstanding when separating the UBO from the corporation.
I would choose one of the places (UAE or Cyprus) and try to build both personal and corporate residence in the same place.
 
This is off topic. So no link posting.


Please guys stick to thread topic...thx. Switzerland has nothing to do with this thread. I will start zapping off topic posts if it gets out of hand.
I did heed your previous warning which is why I asked first. I am aware you already admonished us, but I also don't want to be rude/disrespectful by not answering forum users.

Thank you for overlooking our recidivism.

personal and corporate residence in the same place.
All the eggs in one basket?
 
is this blog article out yet? @Fred
 
why do we think the small business relief can't be used for a freezone with non qualifying income?

source: https://mof.gov.ae/ministry-of-fina...l-business-relief-for-corporate-tax-purposes/
 
Due to lack of substance for most freezone "start-ups" and vague wording of ministrerial decisions, I guess. For example for freelancers their ministrerial reponse is "small business relief may be available to the self-employed person and other individual entrepreneurs". Note, they state May Be, not Will Be.
 
Reactions: jafo
you can see what qualifying freezone person is on Federal Tax Authority - Corporate Tax Topics

so if the freezone person is not qualifying free zone person then it should be able to get small business relief, is this correct or wrong?
No. It would be a non-qualifying freezone person but a freezone person nonetheless. Bad times for FZCO's, they've become as useless as elevator operators I'm afraid.
 
No. It would be a non-qualifying freezone person but a freezone person nonetheless.
That's wrong and I mentioned just a few posts earlier why.!

You can opt to be handled as a Mainland Company by being a non-Qualifying Freezone Person:



How? By not providing an Audit:



You need to work with the "Negatives" of what's in the written law - it's the same with the Excluded Activity List - it's a final List of Excluded Activities and E-Commerce, Marketing and Consulting is not explicitly mentioned hence it's part of the Included Activities even if not mentioned explicitly there either.

Again - if this sloppy wording is now genius or just mismanagement is another question.

I attach the above Ministry Decision here for everyone again.

Bad times for FZCO's, they've become as useless as elevator operators I'm afraid.
That's your opinion and that's fine but stop spreading here false information if you are not familiar with the matter - again if you position yourself like this instead of saying you "think" - we have no other choice then showing everyone that this is false and misleading information.

is this blog article out yet? @Fred
Already written - get's published during today - we report here back once online.
 

Attachments

Reactions: troubled soul
Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.