I got the point. Thank you very much. Since SVG company isn't regulated, that would be certainly an option to be considered truly.
SVG company is in progress, but still have a chance to access a Cook Island bank if they accept us.
I got the point. Thank you very much. Since SVG company isn't regulated, that would be certainly an option to be considered truly.It's completely legal. Think of the following situation instead (since the principle is the same):
Your company A does say...project management. You have a contract with another company B where it's stated that all expenses are to be paid by company B. So company A hires say...architects, construction workers etc. and then later invoices those expenses to company B in addition the the fee for it's services. Isn't company A technically a payment processor for company B in that case as well? Hint: It practically is, this is perfectly legal and requires no license.
Again, this is just an example of a completely different setup in a different scenario, but I'm just trying to show you another situation which is a lot more common and involves a company technically providing payment processing services.
In your case, you only need the SVG company IMO. Keep in mind that if you go the "payment processing" route, the payment processing company should probably not be a subsidiary.
SVG company is in progress, but still have a chance to access a Cook Island bank if they accept us.I am form St Vincent but you could probably use a St. Kitts LLC with a Cook Island Bank that has IBAN
I got the point. Thank you very much. Since SVG company isn't regulated, that would be certainly an option to be considered truly.
SVG company is in progress but still have a chance to access a Cook Island bank if they accept us.
Honestly, for SVG Company, we're not in the stage to negotiate the platforms with LPs so far. Only FSC firm is under a contract with LP at the moment.If I may ask since I'm in a similar business niche (although on the crypto side), did you end up going with a white label platform or did you code your own and did you have any troubles with opening accounts with liquidity providers for the SVG company
Ok cool that works then and its crypto friendlyI got the point. Thank you very much. Since SVG company isn't regulated, that would be certainly an option to be considered truly.
SVG company is in progress, but still have a chance to access a Cook Island bank if they accept us.
It's completely legal. Think of the following situation instead (since the principle is the same):
Your company A does say...project management. You have a contract with another company B where it's stated that all expenses are to be paid by company B. So company A hires say...architects, construction workers etc. and then later invoices those expenses to company B in addition the the fee for it's services. Isn't company A technically a payment processor for company B in that case as well? Hint: It practically is, this is perfectly legal and requires no license.
Again, this is just an example of a completely different setup in a different scenario, but I'm just trying to show you another situation which is a lot more common and involves a company technically providing payment processing services.
In your case, you only need the SVG company IMO. Keep in mind that if you go the "payment processing" route, the payment processing company should probably not be a subsidiary.
Very interesting topic! Ive often wondered how EU based brokers get around the headache of banking/receiving client funds when going for licenses off shore (SvG/Marshall Islands etc). Even the major and regulated brokers tend to run off shore/unregulated brokerages as part of their "group" if you look hard enough. Especially after the introduction of Mifid in the EU where I'd bet the majority of their business is going through their off shore entities under the guise of them being part of a regulated group. Yet the topic is shrouded in secrecy.
In terms of the OPs original question are you saying for arguments sake the set up could be :
Company A - registered in the EU (cyprus/england/germany). This company could provide "support services" (amongst others) etc and obtains IBAN via Bunq thus allowing it to receive funds from clients (Via WT), and or PSPs through e merch.
Company B - SvG licensed IBC
The EU company A will then invoice company B for X amount (monthly/yearly etc) depending on agreements signed for the support..?
This all sounds well and good but I still don't understand how the broker, who owns both companies, is able to get the "profits" out of the EU company. Surely you can only invoice a certain amount per month/year before the Eu registered company starts being investigated? If you have a difference with the invoice amount and what is sitting on the EU company balances?
Hurts my head just thinking about it!
Honestly, I am thinking exactly as same as you do. Maybe I don't understand the point.In terms of the OPs original question are you saying for arguments sake the set up could be :
Company A - registered in the EU (cyprus/england/germany). This company could provide "support services" (amongst others) etc and obtains IBAN via Bunq thus allowing it to receive funds from clients (Via WT), and or PSPs through e merch.
Company B - SvG licensed IBC
The EU company A will then invoice company B for X amount (monthly/yearly etc) depending on agreements signed for the support..?
This all sounds well and good but I still don't understand how the broker, who owns both companies, is able to get the "profits" out of the EU company. Surely you can only invoice a certain amount per month/year before the Eu registered company starts being investigated? If you have a difference with the invoice amount and what is sitting on the EU company balances?
Hurts my head just thinking about it!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?