I’ve always put weight behind regulatory warnings but recently became aware of two which sequentially posted incorrect information
1) was labeled by its product not company - the product ceased in 2019 and was a open source wallet
2) was labeled by its company but as a VASP when it literally sold access to its products (mainly data processing or data related or social etc)
Both ceased In 2019 but warnings issued for ceased / dissolved entities that had nothing to do with the warning context.
So now I am asking myself a question - do they actually research before warning or is it based on some ANI ?
1) was labeled by its product not company - the product ceased in 2019 and was a open source wallet
2) was labeled by its company but as a VASP when it literally sold access to its products (mainly data processing or data related or social etc)
Both ceased In 2019 but warnings issued for ceased / dissolved entities that had nothing to do with the warning context.
So now I am asking myself a question - do they actually research before warning or is it based on some ANI ?