I have always been a supporter of Wise, because, with it all its quirks, it has always given me some confidence on the fact that they were doing things right.
Revolut it's a different story, and I would never trust them with my money.
https://www.wired.com/story/revolut-needs-to-get-its-house-in-order/
So basically, if they have no license, they are in trouble. Avoid at all costs, in my opinion.
Revolut it's a different story, and I would never trust them with my money.
https://www.wired.com/story/revolut-needs-to-get-its-house-in-order/
When Revolut eventually filed its last set of accounts in March, six months late, there was a catch: Its auditor, BDO, could not verify with certainty three-quarters of its revenues—£476.9 million ($591.6 million)—because of problems with its IT practices. Another delayed financial audit was the last thing it needed.
For more than two years, the firm has attempted to convince the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), the body that supervises UK banks, that it’s worthy of a UK banking license.
,,,
Without a UK banking license, says Ruth Wandhöfer, an author and fintech consultant—who helped negotiate the terms of the EU payments legislation that opened the door to fintechs like Revolut—the company would have to completely rethink its growth strategy. There would be a “whole ecosystem of financial products” the firm wouldn’t be able to offer, she says. “Basically, you’re not participating in the real action.”
The implications of a rejection would be serious, says David. Not only would Revolut struggle to raise capital at its peak valuation, which was likely pegged to the ability to lend in its largest market, he says, but potentially to obtain banking licenses in other jurisdictions too. “If the UK regulator says it cannot trust [Revolut] with a banking license,” he says, “other regulators will ask themselves whether they want to be the one” to give the thumbs up.
So basically, if they have no license, they are in trouble. Avoid at all costs, in my opinion.