Comrades,
Here I'd like to discuss legal use-cases that remain for an offshore IBC (unsubstantiated, paper-only). Let's take a step back from the offshore salesman's utopia of 1990's and be realistic about what meaningful things one can achieve with an offshore IBC today, without crossing the line of legality. Your input is welcome.
I'll start off:
1. Ownership Concealement (from the public eyes, but not from the government)
- Ex: You do not like the excess transparency of the UK Companies House. Register an offshore IBC in a jurisdiction where the UBO register is not publicly available, or is behind a pay wall. Declare it to HMRC to stay legal.
2. Passive Holdings (especially in a DTA country)
- Ex: Panamanian resident opens up a Singapore IBC to invest in Singapore. The DTA beautifully outlines how and where the gains and dividends are to be taxed, and therefore, there's minimal risk of inbound aggression and calls for an audit from the local tax office. As with #1, the offshore company must be declared locally.
3. Reputational Wrapper
- Ex: Puerto Rican company has difficulties making sales in the EU as clients are not willing to buy from an "exotic location." They can open up a non-resident Irish or Gibraltarian company which is owned by the local PR company. As per laws of Ireland and Gibraltar, corporate income won't be taxed that isn't sourced from local clients or connected to respective jurisdiction through a PE. And PR is happy because it gets the 4% CIT when income is remitted back to the books of local parent.
4. Stamp Duty Tax Avoidance
- Ex: A property investor can sell the IBC which holds the title to a property instead of titling the property to a new owner, bypassing the stamp duty/property transfer tax. Counter-measures are in place across the developed world, but not everywhere, and not without loopholes (selling 99% of the underlying IBC, for example, works well in parts of the EU). Even as of today, a significant percentage if not majority of shopping malls, hotels, and large private developments are ultimately owned by 0% tax jurisdiction IBCs after a layer or two of reputational wrappers.
Let me know what creative use-cases you have found!
Here I'd like to discuss legal use-cases that remain for an offshore IBC (unsubstantiated, paper-only). Let's take a step back from the offshore salesman's utopia of 1990's and be realistic about what meaningful things one can achieve with an offshore IBC today, without crossing the line of legality. Your input is welcome.
I'll start off:
1. Ownership Concealement (from the public eyes, but not from the government)
- Ex: You do not like the excess transparency of the UK Companies House. Register an offshore IBC in a jurisdiction where the UBO register is not publicly available, or is behind a pay wall. Declare it to HMRC to stay legal.
2. Passive Holdings (especially in a DTA country)
- Ex: Panamanian resident opens up a Singapore IBC to invest in Singapore. The DTA beautifully outlines how and where the gains and dividends are to be taxed, and therefore, there's minimal risk of inbound aggression and calls for an audit from the local tax office. As with #1, the offshore company must be declared locally.
3. Reputational Wrapper
- Ex: Puerto Rican company has difficulties making sales in the EU as clients are not willing to buy from an "exotic location." They can open up a non-resident Irish or Gibraltarian company which is owned by the local PR company. As per laws of Ireland and Gibraltar, corporate income won't be taxed that isn't sourced from local clients or connected to respective jurisdiction through a PE. And PR is happy because it gets the 4% CIT when income is remitted back to the books of local parent.
4. Stamp Duty Tax Avoidance
- Ex: A property investor can sell the IBC which holds the title to a property instead of titling the property to a new owner, bypassing the stamp duty/property transfer tax. Counter-measures are in place across the developed world, but not everywhere, and not without loopholes (selling 99% of the underlying IBC, for example, works well in parts of the EU). Even as of today, a significant percentage if not majority of shopping malls, hotels, and large private developments are ultimately owned by 0% tax jurisdiction IBCs after a layer or two of reputational wrappers.
Let me know what creative use-cases you have found!
Last edited: