This is pretty similar to the arm length principle and you are not exempted from it .Article 5 (6) of the Income Tax Management Act
Where a non-resident person carried on business with a resident person, and it appears to the Commissioner that, owing to the close connection between the resident person and the non-resident person and to the substantial control exercised by the non-resident person over the resident person, the course of business between those persons can be so arranged and is so arranged that the business done by the resident person in pursuance of his connection with the non-resident person produces to the resident person either no profits or less than the ordinary profits which might be expected to arise from the business, the non-resident person shall be assessable and chargeable to tax in the name of the resident person as if the resident person were an agent of the non-resident person.
This won’t work because your transactions must be valued at arm’s length to qualify for the exemption.However, the rules will not apply to transactions entered into a financial period where during the said financial period the aggregate arm’s length amount of
This won’t work because your transactions must be valued at arm’s length to qualify for the exemption.
Because it lowers the compliance burden and the associated costs for SME's .I don't get it - why have a threshold for transfer pricing rules at all then?
You still have profit fragmentation rules ..In the UK, SME's are exempt from transfer pricing when trading with companies in countries that the UK has a tax treaty with and which contains a nondiscrimination article.
What does this mean?Master file, Local File , CBC etc.....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?