Our valued sponsor

Euro Pacific bank is a scam

Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.
Your quoting a part of a an agreement related to a dead entity. How are you gonna enforce it?
That was the part that contained information about the stuff you inquired. It also mentions that the entity is fully owned by Quenta so you would have to enforce them. If the gold is not managed the same way that they promised that is a breach of contract.
I don't know how long it takes to get certified, however Quenta would have 6 months to get it after the agreement is accepted by OCIF. Since OCIF doesn't seem to be accepting anything anytime soon they might have more than a year to get certified again.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SCHLOSSFINANZ
do you understand how legal frameworks (corporate law) is structured? You can't enforce Qenta if G-Commerce is dead because G-Commerce has limited liability and the shareholder (Qenta) is not liable for anything! It is hard to explain to you the current situation with EPB when you lack basic knowledge of banking and legal entities...
 
Why would someone with that knowledge need explanations? To know what they already know? To understand what they already understand? If you don't like my answers then STOP asking me these questions! Not everyone who had a savings account or gold at EPB had a business major from an US institute.
And yes you are correct that I do not understand how you can indemnify yourself from liability by simply failing to renewing a license.
 
because you write absolute nonsense here makes me wonder how you come to such conclusions.
Hold PS accuntable for what he did. When you fall for his conspiracy theory trap its clearly that you have no clue at all.
What does corporate law have anything to do with PS? You are the one introducing theories here. I do not need to ask PS to see that his bank was treated unfairly. All I need is a pair of eyes. Was Silicon Valley Bank treated this way? Were all customers of SVB also been investigated? Was SVB investigated by anyone prior to going broke? Did the IRS spread claims they could not substantiate about that bank as well? If PS is the criminal you believe him to be why didn't the IRS accuse him or his bank of anything at court? They didn't have any problem sending his dad to prison for life for giving bad advice.

Maybe you are right and Quenta is legally allowed to steal all of the opt in money. Even if that happens that would not change my mind because those are two separate things. Everyone (or most) including me had the choice to opt out. I knew that this liquidation would take years given how corrupt the system is and so I didn't want to turn my gold in. It was a risk, end of story.
 
PS wrote here that the money is safe. For me that is sufficient. You can keep on going on and on and make yourself and everybody sick. It is in the first place upto the Receiver and Qenta to get things out in the open, give solutions and get things done. If the receiver puts in writing that the money is gone then ofcourse we all got the get together asap and start legal action...against all parties if needed
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthernDutchman
What CEO of Qenta has told to Peter can be anything far away from truth.

It took even a few weeks before Peter succeeded to reach him. Then all the sudden we have good news.

Peter tells us only, what he as been told without proof any kind.

We even don’t know where the funds are at the moment.

I was recently in Dubai, where Qenta should have one of their main offices.

It was closed and rent was not paid.

So everything is fine, no worries.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: john8899
So we have a first-hand account that Qenta balances are at significant risk or already gone. Because not paying the rent is a huge red-flag.
Please friends, in my humble opinion you are not helping yourself. You are jumping to conclusions.... Unfortunately, I dont have answers, but there is also the possibility that the money is there and things are just being dragged out...
 
Message to all (new) members. There about 30 customers joined hiring a lawyer in Puerto Rico. Check:
www.https://europacific-customers.com

They all chip in so we get first hand information. The more we get the better. Maybe if things go ugly and we have enough customers we can start a lawsuit. This will cost money so the more customers join the better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: feelfunk
Message to all (new) members. There about 30 customers joined hiring a lawyer in Puerto Rico. Check:
www.https://europacific-customers.com

They all chip in so we get first hand information. The more we get the better. Maybe if things go ugly and we have enough customers we can start a lawsuit. This will cost money so the more customers join the better.
You guys have a great lawsuit against OCIF and the IRS. My lawsuit proves there was no valid reason to have put the bank into receivership. The OCIF commissioner violated her fiduciary duty to customers by pursing a politically motivated action to promote the interests of the J5, that needed a publicity stunt to pretend it shutdown a bank that was facilitating money laundering and tax evasion. She sacrificed the best interest of customers to make that happen. OCIF is trying to get my lawsuit dismissed. Their arguments that I released my claims and that my lawsuit is time barred due to a one-year statute of limitations, while bogus, can not even been used against customers. They didn't sign anything that can be argued was a release, and the statute of limitation clock has not even started to run as no one has been given any of their money back yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: milhous
whose competence?
The competence of a lawyer who is actually capable of handling an issue like this, Who has the leadership qualities and the moderator capabilities and who charges reasonably. His/Her clients are a group of damaged party members who do not run on emotions but on analytical observation and willingness for effective collaboration. - So far I do not see this in existence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Optout
You guys have a great lawsuit against OCIF and the IRS. My lawsuit proves there was no valid reason to have put the bank into receivership. The OCIF commissioner violated her fiduciary duty to customers by pursing a politically motivated action to promote the interests of the J5, that needed a publicity stunt to pretend it shutdown a bank that was facilitating money laundering and tax evasion. She sacrificed the best interest of customers to make that happen. OCIF is trying to get my lawsuit dismissed. Their arguments that I released my claims and that my lawsuit is time barred due to a one-year statute of limitations, while bogus, can not even been used against customers. They didn't sign anything that can be argued was a release, and the statute of limitation clock has not even started to run as no one has been given any of their money back yet.
At some point mr Schiff we will ask You for cooperation with gathering as many clients as possible.
 
Message to all (new) members. There about 30 customers joined hiring a lawyer in Puerto Rico. Check:
www.https://europacific-customers.com

They all chip in so we get first hand information. The more we get the better. Maybe if things go ugly and we have enough customers we can start a lawsuit. This will cost money so the more customers join the better.
Link doesn’t work.
 
@Pschiff where is the liquidation process stuck at the moment? Qenta and receiver cannot consolidate?
 
Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.