Do EMIs comply with CRS just like any bank or there is difference?

Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.
Most EMIs provide unique IBAN that you can use to receive wires to your name nowadays.
I suppose those are reportable?

Exactly. IBAN in your own name is always reportable unless of adhere circumstances. Shared IBAN that relies on transaction reference number to receive payments is not reportable - currently out of scope in CRS.
 


You are wrong. This is 21 century. With technologies like Big data and Data science, any tax agency can analyze millions of data.

Example : HMRC Connect.
 
Most, if not all, EMIs that provide "private IBANs" are actually just providing virtual IBANs. Those IBANs help them know which transfer goes to which customer. The actual money is still in pooled accounts though.

TW is explicitly stating that it does not report to any tax authority. They have been very upfront so far, and I don't think they are lying. Tinfoil hats off please.

Obviously the authorities will compel such companies to report at some point, but that point isn't today.
 
You are wrong. This is 21 century. With technologies like Big data and Data science, any tax agency can analyze millions of data.

Example : HMRC Connect.

The fact that one country was able to advance in analysing tax data doesn't mean everyone can. The mere existence of something superior doesn't make the inferior disappear. Just look at the CRS. Western European country will be able to exchange information with a relatively small margin of error, but less technological advanced countries will struggle.


Nothing to do with tinfoil hats. TW might report nothing atm, but will do once they've been informed that CRS protocol needs to be implemented. And reporting RA isn't limited to the date of CRS implementation. They will probably report all RA made from >2016. For EMI's it's just a matter of time.