Because that is what GrumpyMess already pointed out several times. You can give up residency but you still have some ties to your home country - whether strong ones (family, job, children) or weak ones (even citizenship can be considered when defining you "center of vital interests").Why wouldyou not be able to give up your residency where ever it is now, move to Dubai, stay there for some time and even move to another country.
Are you sure about that? So I'm glad I don't live in Finland this is odd and sounds a little bit strange.if you are Finnish, you end your residency and then travel the world for 3 years, if you come back, you will be considered resident of Finland again - not just for the current year but also for the past 3 years. Even when you had no address in Finland and you didn't live there, you still were a tax resident there.
What countries did you chose for your residency during this time?I have been a nomad for past 7 years
Sorta kinda. You are still not allowed to WORK without a work permit in Thailand. Work permits are only given to people working for Thai registered companies. If you ignore that specific labor law, and work in Thailand anyway, then you are still exposed to the tax laws. If you get compensated directly for your work (=salary), then by law you need to pay tax in Thailand regardless of remittance.Thailand will give you tax residency and not tax money earned outside Thailand, provided it is is not remitted to Thailand
Hi,
I have gone all over the thread and also most of the forum posts and still have a question :
...
There is a clear legal concept for this scenario defined in CRS/AEOI, called Stateless Persons. On contrary, an entity is never stateless. If an entity fails to fulfill residency requirements through PE rules or other laws in any country, it is resident where it is incorporated.
Every bank may have their own risk-based approach to Stateless Persons but the CRS/AEOI model gives clear guidelines. Some banks are refusing stateless persons altogether and there's nothing illegal about such approach either.
Unless the bank has their own risk-based approach, they generally default to following:
1. Ask the client to provide sufficient evidence of stateless status (bank statements for last 12 months from their own records may suffice)
2. If they cannot provide plausible evidence of stateless status, proceed to close the account
If you tell your bank you are tax resident in a country where you renounced your tax residency, you are shooting yourself in the foot. If the tax office receives this claim, they will happily treat you as such. Start by showing your bank the form of tax residency renunciation and provide sufficient proof of frequent travel.
I know many (but probably not yet all) banks ask for tax ID at account opening. I am not sure, but I think the do already or might later update records at some point if they did not ask for tax ID in the first place.
So I would be wondering what tax ID a stateless person would provide. If there is a way to get a (full-fledged*) tax ID, it would probably also work to be stateless.
If you are stateless, who would be providing your passport? I can imagine countries will (at some point) start saying the country of citizenship would be the tax residence if no other can be proven. So even if that concept works now, it might not in the long run. Having something that works now is already better than nothing ;-)
* are there different types of tax ID?
I think you confuse stateless with non resident. Very few people are stateless but some are not tax resident anywhere.There is a clear legal concept for this scenario defined in CRS/AEOI, called Stateless Persons. On contrary, an entity is never stateless. If an entity fails to fulfill residency requirements through PE rules or other laws in any country, it is resident where it is incorporated.
Every bank may have their own risk-based approach to Stateless Persons but the CRS/AEOI model gives clear guidelines. Some banks are refusing stateless persons altogether and there's nothing illegal about such approach either.
Unless the bank has their own risk-based approach, they generally default to following:
1. Ask the client to provide sufficient evidence of stateless status (bank statements for last 12 months from their own records may suffice)
2. If they cannot provide plausible evidence of stateless status, proceed to close the account
If you tell your bank you are tax resident in a country where you renounced your tax residency, you are shooting yourself in the foot. If the tax office receives this claim, they will happily treat you as such. Start by showing your bank the form of tax residency renunciation and provide sufficient proof of frequent travel.
However as a person without any tax residency its normally very easy to just use your previous address and tax number, while a stateless person doesn't have a passport and can't open an account at all.@busdriver N26, Revolut, TW... I'm not sure they are qualified as digital nomad banks. In my context, they only qualify if they clearly state in their FAQ that they accept a 'tax resident of nowhere', i.e. persons who split their time in between multiple countries.
In regards to Tax ID, many CRS member states do not have it to begin with. I don't see how it could be mandatory at this point.
@fshore you're right, the terminology varies per implementation guides and official documents. I'm mixing them up. With that said, you may expect most banks treating 'stateless persons' and 'tax resident of nowhere' similarly, if not identically in regards to CRS AEOI.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?