Our valued sponsor

Crypto Scams Involving Estonia-Licensed Crypto Exchanges

Martin Everson

Offshore Retiree
Moderator
Jan 2, 2018
10,243
1
9,893
173
https://www.emergingpayments.org/ar...lutions-in-estonia-licensed-crypto-exchanges/
------ quote start

  • Nine regulated crypto businesses provided payment pages for scam sites
  • Lithuanian and UK e-money institutions furnish the licensees with payment accounts
Holders of Estonia’s controversial cryptocurrency licences are being widely used by online investment scams to accept payments from victims, an investigation by VIXIO has found.

Estonia’s financial intelligence unit (FIU) has licensed thousands of mainly offshore cryptocurrency exchange and wallet providers since 2017, prompting the unit to seek new powers from the government to stem the tide of licence applications.

The FIU warned last year that the licensees are being used in investment scams and to launder money, and that in 2019 just 32 of the some 2,000 licensed cryptocurrency firms were subject to inspections.

Despite the allegations thrown at the sector, which has also been spurned by Estonia’s banks, regulated e-money institutions in Lithuania and the UK have opened payment accounts for the licensees, including those which were used by scams to accept payments, according to Estonian licensing records.

Following a sign-up to investment scams, which are often found through ads featuring fake quotes from celebrities, victims are prompted to make a deposit to begin trading.

Estonian exchanges are often presented as an option through which a user can purchase cryptocurrency to fund their account in fiat currencies, a VIXIO review of dozens of websites found.

The user is then redirected to the licence holder’s payment page, where the cryptocurrency wallet address belonging to the scam is pre-filled as the destination.

VIXIO found nine Estonian exchanges being used to accept payments in this way.

It was not possible to determine the precise relationships between the Estonian entities and fraudulent websites.

Pradexx, an exchange and wallet licence holder, has acted as a payment provider for six scams subject to consumer warnings by regulators in Germany, Italy, Portugal and the UK. Its payment account is provided by Wallter UAB, a Lithuanian fintech, according to Estonian licence records.

On its website, Pradexx promotes itself as a “global leader in payment processing solutions” and says it offers conventional payment gateway services with more than 350 payment service providers.

Pradexx and Wallter did not respond to requests for comment. None of the other Estonian cryptocurrency exchanges identified and contacted by VIXIO responded to requests for comment.

Until legislative changes in 2020, a licence to operate a cryptocurrency business in Estonia required only a criminal record check, passport copy and anti-money laundering plan. Many licences are obtained through company service providers that offer off-the-shelf companies.

Victims of fraudulent websites AccepTrade and Profitstrade are presented with the option of making a deposit by Transcoin, an Estonian exchange that received its licence in July 2020. Its payment account is provided by Lithuanian e-money firm Paysera, according to Estonian records.

Aleksas Rozentalis, a media representative for Paysera, said the company has a strict policy on cryptocurrency businesses and during 2020 closed 719 private accounts “whose owners tried to buy or exchange cryptocurrencies and refused to open accounts for 83 companies that were involved in crypto activities”.

Paysera does not provide any payment acceptance services for Transcoin, Rozentalis added.

Users that open accounts with Dolce 500 and MDX 500, two websites subject to scam warnings by the UK Financial Conduct Authority, are directed to pay through Estonian licence holder BitTheBank.

BitTheBank’s payment account provider is listed as Wittix, another Lithuanian-regulated fintech.

A Wittix spokesperson said that it opened an account for the Estonian business “in order to deposit their share capital for the purpose of obtaining their licence” but that “the account was activated for this purpose only, and our compliance department closed the account before it became operative”.

The company cannot disclose why it closed the account due to confidentiality requirements and did not provide any payment processing for BitTheBank, the spokesperson added.

Bilderlings, an FCA-regulated e-money institution, provides payment accounts for Quamtor and Instacoins, two Estonian businesses that are facilitating crypto payments for EGM Finance and WorldMarkets respectively, two online trading websites subject to regulatory warnings in New Zealand and the UK.

Payment accounts for two more exchanges linked to fraudulent websites were provided by GlobalNetInt, also a Lithuanian e-money institution.

A spokesperson for Estonia’s FIU did not respond to a request for comment. The unit has repeatedly warned it lacks the resources to police the sector.

In 2020, the Estonian parliament passed legislation introducing a “fit and proper” check for new applicants and hiked the licence application fee. The FIU also revoked some 500 licences during the same year.

In response to questions from VIXIO, the Bank of Lithuania said that it has not specifically investigated its regulated firms’ relationships with Estonian virtual currency providers, but that “all financial institutions mentioned in your questions were assessed during on-site or off-site inspections or during their individual risk assessment in terms of the AML/CFT compliance with the Lithuanian laws”.

A spokesperson for the bank pointed to the 2020 inspection of Paysera, which found “significant” anti-money laundering shortcomings including poor application of due diligence on higher risk customers.

Regulated firms providing payment services for cryptocurrency businesses should assess such clients’ money laundering and terrorist financing controls and “take additional measures to reduce and manage ML/TF risks” if they are inadequate, the spokesperson added.

“Special attention should be paid when the activity that is carried out requires permits (licenses) and customers are unable to provide them as well as when a company operates in one jurisdiction and opens a payment account in another.”

Cryptocurrency exchanges are not the only area of the underregulated payments ecosystem — payment gateways also can attract fraudsters and facilitate crime, as reported.

------ quote end
 
Cause and effect, A leads into B:

Anti-money laundering chief: Cryptocurrency licenses should be revoked​

Cryptocurrency operating licenses in Estonia should be revoked, and the system rebuilt from scratch, chief of the money laundering bureau (RAB) Matis Mäeker told investigative weekly Eesti Ekspress. Failure to do so may result in another Danske-style financial scandal.

The rest of the story here.
 
Now that is a guy thinking with his head screwed on and sees the obvious dangers thu&¤#.
 
Anti-money laundering chief: Cryptocurrency licenses should be revoked
oof. If that happens, that wouldn't really put that much faith into the Estonian Crypto Regulatory Framework, which is weird considering how the country is known to be a pioneer in the blockchain industry.

I know that there might be some bad actors who benefited - or exploited - the system, but that doesn't mean that they have to punish the ones that are complying and only serving low risk customers.

Building a system from a scratch makes no sense if Estonia’s FIU won't be able to monitor this sector properly, and the right way to do it is to increase the budget of the FIU so they can have more power and resources to screen the applicants thoroughly instead of doing what they doing right now.

So, Idk what he's trying to say or achieve tbh. Seems more like an emotional reaction for PR purposes than a logical one. you can't just go and don't destroy an entire system like that. so idk, but we will see...
 
Seems more like an emotional reaction for PR purposes than a logical one. you can't just go and don't destroy an entire system like that.
I don't think they will burn it completely down. But it is evident they bit way more than they can chew. Too many companies to monitor, too few staff, not enough money coming in. They've realized they have allowed a huge risk surface to appear with only paltry benefits for the country.

It would have been better to start off with a much more limited licence, for example licencing only crypto exchanges and lending services, or whatever they thought gave the best return/risk ratio. Oh well, live and learn.

Next move: revoke e-citizenship, which is another Estonian fraud… smi(&%
It is a misnomer, but had they named it e-KYC, nobody would have taken the bait ;)
Estonian banks are the final nail in the coffin, requiring quite a lot of substance.