Our valued sponsor

Could the New U.S. Tariffs Trigger a Shift in Domestic Tax Policies Worldwide?

Dear All,

With rising protectionism and shifting trade dynamics, how likely is it that countries will respond to U.S. tariffs by adjusting their own internal tax structures — such as introducing new corporate taxes, VAT hikes, or even personal income tax reforms — to protect revenues and stay competitive?

Do you think which countries are gonna benefit from this situation more ?

KR,
 
  • Like
Reactions: undercover
I think countries will start imposing taxes on foreign services. The US has been doing it for a while. The IRS forces US companies to withhold 30% of the invoice amount.

I could also see Europe and other large economies imposing a digital tax on large tech firms. Tariffs on trade is so 1900. The US can be truly hurt by imposing taxes/tariffs on services.
 
I think countries will start imposing taxes on foreign services. The US has been doing it for a while. The IRS forces US companies to withhold 30% of the invoice amount.

I could also see Europe and other large economies imposing a digital tax on large tech firms. Tariffs on trade is so 1900. The US can be truly hurt by imposing taxes/tariffs on services.
That not correct. US companies only withhold 30% on services performed in the US. 0% if the services are performed outside the US.
 
That not correct. US companies only withhold 30% on services performed in the US. 0% if the services are performed outside the US.
It is a bit more complicated than this. "871 and 881 and under FATCA, U.S. withholding agents are required to withhold 30% of FDAP income paid to foreign payees, subject to reduction under a relevant treaty."

There are exceptions, if the service is FULLY executed outside the US AND you have no employees in the US hence it is not straightforward. Anyhow, my point. was that there is already a system in place to tax foreign services and that is totally enforceable by a government. Goods are not the only things that can be tariffed/taxed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: undercover
It is a bit more complicated than this. "871 and 881 and under FATCA, U.S. withholding agents are required to withhold 30% of FDAP income paid to foreign payees, subject to reduction under a relevant treaty."

There are exceptions, if the service is FULLY executed outside the US AND you have no employees in the US hence it is not straightforward. Anyhow, my point. was that there is already a system in place to tax foreign services and that is totally enforceable by a government. Goods are not the only things that can be tariffed/taxed.
US doesn't tax services bought from outside the US as you suggested they do.
FDAP is not services bought from another country. From IRS: FDAP income consists primarily of passive investment income, including interest, dividends, rents, royalties, etc.

Europe and many countries however does add VAT to foreign services, so yes it's possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: daniels27
Yes. @thomasparra and @Xshore are IMO correct, VAT is the way to go as I proposed earlier (but I guess was misunderstood).

Apart from that, there are already countries impossible digital service taxes on ads. I guess that they can be increased and digital marketplace taxes added.

Also note that Amazon fees are 15% globally. But those 15% are charged on net value in the US while Amazon gets another 3 to 4% on the VAT in Europe. Hence they effectively charge almost 20% of the net sales value, cashing in billions that don't belong to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thomasparra
The companies mostly have an EU presence, and pay VAT, corporate tax etc already. Any additional tax, such as Digital Service Taxes will just ensure the EU add even more bureaucracy to put off even more people from starting a digital business there.

Because it's such a stupid idea, it will probably happen.
 
It is
The companies mostly have an EU presence, and pay VAT, corporate tax etc already. Any additional tax, such as Digital Service Taxes will just ensure the EU add even more bureaucracy to put off even more people from starting a digital business there.
I think it already exists in several markets. Amazon and Google are paying for those directly, the advertisers only see an additional line on their invoice.
 
Dear All,

With rising protectionism and shifting trade dynamics, how likely is it that countries will respond to U.S. tariffs by adjusting their own internal tax structures — such as introducing new corporate taxes, VAT hikes, or even personal income tax reforms — to protect revenues and stay competitive?

Countries generally do not gain competetiveness from more tax, quite the contraty. Singapore and Ireland are good examples from relatively recent times.
 
I once proposed VAT during the first Trump presidency and then again here on 23 March 2025 but either was misunderstood or my point did not make it. In the mean time, we have seen more reports talking about VAT due to Trump mentioning them in his reciprocal tariffs dating 2 April 2025.

I still stand by my point, that VAT is the way to go. And also would be the proper way to go for the US. Let me explain.

The current situation in the US and (as an example the EU, but could as well be China, Canada, Australia, etc.) is the following:
US.webp


It is very simplified. I even left out existing duties and state sales taxes for the sake of simplicity. In short, the problem is that foreigners can sell goods in the US without paying anything to the US government.

Now, taxing the import value is certainly a way to fix it. However, it is a very bad one. Why?
  • The import value is lower than the retail value. Foreign companies selling cheap stuff at high margins still get around.
  • The EU is known for customs audits with their domestic companies. The guys come to your office, check all invoices you paid supplier and check what you declared and paid duties on. They really do this and sue as you can see in this example from Austria. But how does the IRS or US CPB want to do a customs audit on a Chinese company? Yes, they are not and that's exactly why most imports from China are vastly underdeclared unless the importer is a domestic company.
Hence. the only effect of those duties would be on domestic sellers in the US. That will be Wallmart, Amazon and some car companies and probably some bigger European companies. But really not your favourite Chinese FBA sellers.

Why is VAT good? Check this article:
More entertainingly, it follows from Krugman’s paper that if the US kept the overall level of tax the same, but substituted VAT for some personal tax and corporate tax, and applied VAT to absolutely everything, then that would enhance the competitiveness of, and tend to increase, US exports.
or this one:
As with all taxes, there is a need to balance what is best for the economy overall with the need for the government to raise revenues. Most economists agree that VAT places a lesser deadweight cost on productivity than other forms of taxation, especially income taxes.
Not only does VAT act as export subsidy but it also has less nefarious effects on the economy than personal and corporate income taxes.

What would I recommend (for both US and as a response to US duties)?
  • Substitute as much taxes by VAT. Works well in big economies, while Swiss would probably just travel to the EU for shopping and holidays.
  • Keep tariffs but switch from a value-based to a specific system as Switzerland had it. It means that you no longer pay 5% duties on import value. But you pay 100 USD per bike or per 100 kg of steel. It is much more efficient to keep cheap Chinese goods out and you won't have to deal with fake customs invoices anymore.
How would I fix the US debt? I do not and this post has no intention to do so.
 
Last edited:
VAT is incompatible with the U.S. tax structure without massive and politically impossible reforms.
Claiming foreign sellers “pay nothing” is false, as imports are taxed, and enforcement exists.
Switching to VAT won’t stop customs fraud or under invoicing, and citing Krugman out of context only weakens the argument.
 
VAT is incompatible with the U.S. tax structure without massive and politically impossible reforms.
Probably yes. But once the discussion about no personal income tax below X comes to the table, massive reforms are coming.

Still, other countries may want to counter US tariffs with VAT or digital service taxes as OP proposed.

Claiming foreign sellers “pay nothing” is false, as imports are taxed, and enforcement exists.
If I walk around in China, I hear otherwise. Even in the Netherlands, they evade customs checks.

Switching to VAT won’t stop customs fraud or under invoicing
Without customs, no customs fraud. VAT is relatively easy to collect from marketplace. The sales tax collection works very well on marketplace.

Also, opposed to tariffs, VAT is also due on digital goods and subscriptions.

citing Krugman out of context only weakens the argument.
The other article cited it.

In any case, the US is a very attractive place to do business without paying much there. Thank you.