I didn't watch your video yet but in my opinion there are 2 main reasons:Malta changed limit to 10,000 euros. Also I guess technically the UK has no cash limit but any business accepting cash transactions greater then £10,000 needs to register with HMRC as a high value dealer . The list goes on for other EU countries.
I think the EU restrictions on cash has nothing to do with crime. I think this guy explains the real reason best. We really are in the end game now with the levels of debt out there.
Greeks who fail to spend 30% of their income electronically will be hit with a 22% fine on the shortfall. If an individual spends just 20% of their income through electronic means, they would face a 22% tax on the remaining 10%.
About EURO tokenization, there is actually a paper I just found out: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecb.wp2351~c8c18bbd60.en.pdfI didn't watch your video yet but in my opinion there are 2 main reasons:
- Goverments in the EU need more money cause the welfare is really really expensive (there was a study saying EU has 7% of the world population and has 50% of the world's welfare). This cannot go on forever cause the population is becoming every year older and they enjoyed great benefits in the past we'll never be able to afford in the future (but it's hard to accept, watch what's going on with the pension reform in France, so they just try to buy time!);
- Next step, after pushing people hard on a cashless society, there will be the tokenization of the currency and they'll be applying the negative interest directly on all the deposits; it's clear the monetary policy cannot do much more and we'll deal one day with the side effects of it (one for all: no yield for pension funds!) but the bank deposits are growing pretty everywhere and people just prefer to consume less and corporate to invest less, so they do need to try something out of the box.
The world simply cannot afford a recession nor an interest hike - it would be a disaster for both governments and (zombie) corporations - so it will be interesting to deal with this.
The Napoleon's soldiers was very well payed. A very very good salary. But the (obligated) condition was that they must to spend at least the half part of this salary. Evidently to make runing the economy of the empire. Bad or good idea, it was part of the activation of the economy in war time.
The Napoleon's soldiers was very well payed. A very very good salary. But the (obligated) condition was that they must to spend at least the half part of this salary. Evidently to make runing the economy of the empire. Bad or good idea, it was part of the activation of the economy in war time.
Greece don't invent nothing new