Our valued sponsor

bypass 30 percent withholding tax for royalties

There are some good reads here

You can either setup a company in Georgia and then pay out the profits to you as active income (if your country does not tax them) or you move to Georgia.
 
Yes if a Ltd, and then you have to pay UK corporate tax on this amount (25/19%).
The reason why I asked this, I read somewhere on this forum that if you do a US LLC, they'd still withhold 30 percent as a non resident. Why would a UK LTD as a non resident bypass the withhold tax?
There are some good reads here

You can either setup a company in Georgia and then pay out the profits to you as active income (if your country does not tax them) or you move to Georgia.
Thanks for the info, but it has to be the UK for a specific reason.
 
If I understood it correctly, withholding tax depends upon where the UBO is resident and not the company? "The provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article shall not apply if thebeneficial owner of the royalties, being a resident of a Contracting State, carries onbusiness in the other Contracting State, in which the royalties arise, through apermanent establishment situated therein, and the royalties are attributable to suchpermanent establishment. In such case, the provisions of Article 7 (Business Profits)of this Convention shall apply"
 
Georgia is the way to go. I wrote up this for the other linked post: https://www.offshorecorptalk.com/th...ture-2-1-effective-tax-rate.46119/post-341054

1. Set up an entity in Georgia or Kyrgyzstan – Both benefit from the old CIS double tax treaty, which has no LOB clause. Georgia is the better choice. There’s a solid CSP in this forum I’ve worked with. You’ll need minimal substance—1-2 local employees. Given your revenue, you or your wife will likely want an assistant and an accountant anyway, so just hire them there. Georgian companies are called LLCs, so you can be creative with how you present the entity in your invoices, if you know what I mean.

2A. Georgia’s Free-Zone Tech Exemption – You can apply for a reduced 5% CIT, but this requires hiring software developers, which may not be ideal if you're not in that industry. If that works, a single Georgian entity is enough.

2B. IP Structuring Alternative – If you don’t want to hire developers, hold the IP in an offshore TopCo in a jurisdiction with a DTT with Georgia --but not a GBC Mauritius company with the tax holiday exemption as some people said here, as there's no DTT, so withholding applies. Instead, structure the Georgian entity as an agent with sublicensing rights, allowing you to pass through any profits as IP income to the TopCo—minus a small amount taxed in Georgia. Good TopCo locations with strong DTTs with Georgia include: UAE (DIFC PresCo recommended, as royalties are tax-exempt), Cyprus (your IP may not qualify for the IP box, in which case it’s subject to 12.5% CIT), Malta (10% effective tax due to refunds, plus a nice place to visit). All these options require local directors and board meetings... to ensure economic substance is met, adding a minimum of €20-25K/year in costs if done properly. But if your revenue is as high as you mentioned, that’s a rounding error.
 
If I understood it correctly, withholding tax depends upon where the UBO is resident and not the company?

US tax treaties are structured in a way that to access the benefits of the treaty UBO has the be tax resident of the country used to claim the treaty. If a UK entity (either a company or natural person) claims the benefits of the treaty it has to pay UK taxes.

There's no way to avoid that and i assure you i've read every word of those treaties, i've read technical analysis looking for a loophole, there is none that can be exploited.

Georgia is the way to go.

Georgia is surely an option but banking will be problematic, especially when you receive USD.
 
US tax treaties are structured in a way that to access the benefits of the treaty UBO has the be tax resident of the country used to claim the treaty. If a UK entity (either a company or natural person) claims the benefits of the treaty it has to pay UK taxes.
Do you mean that if the UK company doesn't claim treaty benefits then it doesn't have to pay UK corporate tax on the income? Or would have to pay both 30% royalties and 25% UK tax?
 
If UK company wouldn't be able to access the benefits of the treaty would have to pay 30% US WHT on royalties and obtain a credit for the taxes paid overseas but obiously up to the UK CIT so max 25% or 19% depending in which tax bracket would fall the UK company.

Or would have to pay both 30% royalties and 25% UK tax?

This happens with countries without a US tax treaty. For example UAE where you will pay 30% US WHT on royalties plus 9% UAE CIT, not funny.
 
If you don't have access to treaty benefits, you have the same situation as if there was no treaty. So there can be double taxation.
Most countries give some relief (tax credit) for tax paid overseas, even if there is no treaty.
 
Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.