Our valued sponsor

Banks begun going bankrupt, Stable coins depegged.

Wow, and Signature Bank just outright closed by the US regulator. I think crypto is relatively safe now. I was afraid they would just open tomorrow with only $250K insured available to depositors with the rest coming much later, causing a lot of uncertainty. This might have crashed Circle with all the redemptions (and crashed Signature Bank for sure). I am quite sure Signature has / had trouble it was hiding away from the public.
 
  • Like
Reactions: troubled soul
3 US banks in 1 week....thats a hat trick.
 
3 US banks in 1 week....thats a hat trick.
I bought the dip at open, hope to have the week of my life when we open tomorrow. Today you had PacWest trading at its lowest level since IPO (-75% of COVID low) while insiders bought Thurday and Friday when the SVB crisis was unfolding and they thought they could get the deal of a lifetime. Sometimes the opportunities are too good I guess.
 
I bought the dip at open, hope to have the week of my life when we open tomorrow. Today you had PacWest trading at its lowest level since IPO (-75% of COVID low) while insiders bought Thurday and Friday when the SVB crisis was unfolding and they thought they could get the deal of a lifetime. Sometimes the opportunities are too good I guess.

The insiders didn't do too well. You may do better but I don't know much about this bank.

PacWest Bancorp insiders lost $900,000 after buying stock as it tumbled last week​


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/p...t-some-stock-as-it-tumbled-last-week-d08ecb76
 
The insiders didn't do too well. You may do better but I don't know much about this bank.

PacWest Bancorp insiders lost $900,000 after buying stock as it tumbled last week​


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/p...t-some-stock-as-it-tumbled-last-week-d08ecb76
I think they never expected the bank to drop much lower, SVB risk is quite a bit overstated IF you are well-capitalized. PacWest did not experience rapid balance sheet growth over the last years, most of their clients are long-term (and those that are VCs, 33% of deposits approx.) are not going to rush to JPM, maybe move 1/3 or 1/2 of their money, management is steady and has a background I like (large length of career within the same bank, no red flags). It's a conservative bank that doesn't buy into bulls**t and is generally well perceived by its customers, it has survived 2008, and it will certainly survive this storm-in-a-teacup in my opinion. Small to mid-sized businesses will never get the support at JPM, C or BAC they would receive at a bank like PacWest, and they know the conservative approach they take, which is why they don't move their money.

They dropped this statement to start-up clients:

“Given all the noise in the market surrounding SVB’s liquidity pressures, we want to assure you PacWest is in a sound financial position and actively supporting new and existing venture banking clients. We took measures during 2022 to get out in front of macroeconomic headwinds impacting the banking industry and continue to maintain strong capital ratios with a stable, diversified deposit base. We do not have the level of bond portfolio exposure as SVB, nor the level of exposure to venture/tech which differentiates us from SVB’s pure-play venture play (VB is less than 33% of PWB’s deposit base/7% of our loan mix and our Community Bank & HOA deposits are extremely stable). I’m including some detail around our investor and balance sheet highlights from Q4 below and would be happy to schedule a call for you to connect with our CFO if you have any remaining questions that aren’t answered below.”

I checked what they posted Friday in terms of financials, and it all checks out, there is zero-reason for me to think they will collapse, and I will gladly take this risk given the risk-reward ratio.

Of course always DYODD.

Btc working exactly as expected, people buying it as the only real safe haven.

Absolutely amazing, the best play during the USDC collapse fear was selling USDC for BTC / ETH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Martin Everson
If you keep your reserves in USDT then probably you should care, otherwise not
holding some part of reserves in stablecoins makes sense for a guy in Argentina or Sri Lanka
for anybody with access to western banking system it's kind of like holding your wealth in your favorite chain coupons trusting a third party... we already have this and it doesn't work
 
holding some part of reserves in stablecoins makes sense for a guy in Argentina or Sri Lanka
for anybody with access to western banking system it's kind of like holding your wealth in your favorite chain coupons trusting a third party... we already have this and it doesn't work
Do you really believe that stablecoins are stable coins?