Recent content by danielboros

My conspiracy theory is that without the receivership the HMRC would not have been able to obtain the client list of EPB legally, so it was necessary. I've sent a FOIA to the HRMC so we will hopefully see who gave them the data.

It says it in the text.

https://web.archive.org/web/20221116202008/https://www.ocif.pr.gov/Avisos%20Publicos/FirstFinance_Press%20Release.pdf

Is this a competition? :D I have about $50 in all my bank accounts combined, even less in cash and the Government quadrupled my taxes while the US added an extra 30% from their side plus inflation last year was also above 30% (this year is only around 15%). I canceled anything non essential like...

I see no proof that all Australian and/or all Dutch customers were contacted by authorities. If it was reported, where is the report? If someone is already investigated of course you could get info from the Bank or the IRS, but that is different from giving away every single name on a list. I'm...

If they had no choice show me the order. So if you investigate the bank, not the account holders, the bank, you get the data of the account holders? Wouldn't you have to show negligence at least? Probable cause perhaps? If the cops investigate a house do they get to keep the house after the...

I didn't say that. I said that the IRS believed that. How does that give the J5 access to customer accounts who don't have a brokerage account? How do you know that the media frenzy had nothing to do with OCIF? Do you believe there was no collusion between OCIF and IRS? If that is so why did...

Hi all, just wanted to put in my thoughts as another victim of this nonsense. I think this is what happened and why: Since EPB's customers were non US citizens I would argue that it is the HMRC and similar organizations of the J5 who cared about the bank and not the IRS. This is just a favor...